Agency Comparison
Converteo vs OstraconAI
Comparing AI Consulting options: Paris vs Helsinki.
Comparison updated · Newest review
Side by side
Published data on both agencies. Where one side measurably differs, the dot marks it: the higher score, the lower published rate, the larger team, the more recent review. Which of those is an advantage depends on your brief.
| Attribute | Converteo | OstraconAI |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | Higher score: 70.8/100 | 60/100 |
| Hourly rate | Contact for rates | €250-400/hr |
| Team size | Larger team: 250+ | 10-49 |
| Location | Paris, France | Helsinki, Finland |
| Founded | — | 2024 |
| Last reviewed | Aug 5, 2026 | More recent review: Sep 23, 2026 |
What we said about each
Our take on Converteo
Sharlie, the voice agent behind Orange's Sosh brand, is the most completely documented build in this register, and the detail is the point. Converteo committed to a voice-to-voice architecture in April 2024, before the model reached general availability, specifically to avoid a later migration off a speech-to-text pipeline—a decision that bought roughly one second of latency against three. Around thirty specialized agents hand off between themselves, escalate to a human, and act on Orange's…
Reviewed Aug 5, 2026
Read the full assessment →Our take on OstraconAI
Eleven case studies are published and every client is named, splitting into five internal tools, three AI-assisted outbound campaigns and three strategy or roadmap engagements. The deployment detail is strongest at Singa: an n8n and Gemini pipeline that enriches, scores and routes inbound leads into HubSpot, live in week three, with a Slack channel for flagging errors and prompts tuned weekly—manual lead sorting went from 45 minutes a day to single-digit minutes. Nordic Healthcare Group's Azure…
Reviewed Sep 23, 2026
Read the full assessment →Best for
Where each agency measurably leads on the published data — team capacity, declared specializations, editorial scoring, and rates where both publish them. Use these to match an agency to your project priorities.
Choose Converteo if you need
- larger team capacity for multi-stream or enterprise-scale programs
- disclosed specialization in Manufacturing
- broader service offering — also covers AI Agents and AI Development
- a higher overall editorial score
Choose OstraconAI if you need
- closer collaboration at a smaller team scale
- disclosed specialization in Healthcare / SaaS & B2B
- broader service offering — also covers AI Automation
Strengths and watch-outs
Both upsides and risks, straight from our editorial assessments.
Converteo
Strengths
- One engagement documented end to end, including the architecture decision, its latency cost, the evaluation rig and the kill switch—no other agency here publishes at that level
- Evaluation as a discipline rather than an afterthought: virtual clients, an LLM-as-a-judge scoring price accuracy and brand posture, and an AI bug bounty before exposure to customers
- Ten-plus named clients across retail, energy and industry, with the work described case by case rather than listed as logos
Watch-outs
- Outside the voice-agent work, most published cases are data and marketing engineering—confirm which practice your engagement lands in
- No headcount, founding year or rates published; scale and price both have to be established in conversation
OstraconAI
Strengths
- All 11 case studies name the client, and most quote a named executive with title—Sanoma Media Finland's Chief Commercial Officer, S-Group's Head of Marketing Strategies, Singa's CCO
- The Gosta Labs study publishes its funnel: 3,930 messages, 198 replies and 62 opportunities across three oncology congresses, with the best campaign near a 19% reply rate
- Handover is part of the delivery: Claude Code training at Barona and Claude training at Olo-apteekki so the client team maintains the tools itself
Watch-outs
- Several headline numbers are forecasts or quotes—Attendo is 'about to save' 9,000 hours, Sanoma's 'millions of euros' is an estimate—ask which figures were measured after launch
- The hourly rate on this listing sits well above the European range on our rate index, while the site prices by project and monthly retainer—ask how many hours the retainer buys
- Builds run on n8n, Copilot Studio, Azure, Clay, Apollo and Instantly—ask who owns the workflows and accounts, and who monitors them after the engagement ends
Service coverage
Where the two overlap, and where each covers ground the other does not.
Industry coverage
Where the two overlap, and where each covers ground the other does not.
Pricing math
What a 12-week engagement at one full-time equivalent (~480 hours) costs at each agency’s published rate. An arithmetic projection, not a quote — real scopes move with seniority mix and team shape.
Converteo
Contact for rates
OstraconAI
Rate: €250-400/hr
€120,000–€192,000
Only OstraconAI publishes a rate, so there is no gap to measure. Converteo quotes per engagement — ask for a rate card early, since a comparison that starts on scope and ends on price tends to end late.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more E-commerce experience, Converteo or OstraconAI?
- Both agencies show documented E-commerce work. OstraconAI has the broader industry stack overall, with disclosed experience in Healthcare, SaaS & B2B, FinTech beyond their shared focus.
- Which scores higher overall, Converteo or OstraconAI?
- Converteo scores 70.8/100, 10.8 points higher than OstraconAI at 60/100. Both portfolio quality and business credibility feed into the score — see our methodology for the full breakdown.
- Which is faster to engage, Converteo or OstraconAI?
- Neither publishes lead times, so this is a read on team size rather than a measured answer. OstraconAI runs the smaller team, which usually means fewer procurement gates and a shorter path to kickoff. Converteo runs a larger one, which tends to mean more steps but more capacity to start parallel workstreams. Current kickoff availability is the number that actually decides it — ask both.
- When should I consider both Converteo and OstraconAI?
- Consider running parallel discovery briefs with Converteo and OstraconAI if your project spans multiple workstreams, you want competitive proposals to compare scope and approach, or you're undecided between the specialization angles each brings (see the Best for cards above). Most engagements ultimately go with one — but the parallel-brief phase is a low-cost way to validate fit.
Read the full reviews
A side-by-side is a starting point. The full assessments carry the portfolio analysis, documented engagements, and the evidence behind every strength and watch-out above.