Agency Comparison
Qweri vs Yield Studio
Two top-rated AI Development agencies in Lyon.
Comparison updated · Newest review
Side by side
Published data on both agencies. Where one side measurably differs, the dot marks it: the higher score, the lower published rate, the larger team, the more recent review. Which of those is an advantage depends on your brief.
| Attribute | Qweri | Yield Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 48.8/100 | Higher score: 51/100 |
| Hourly rate | Contact for rates | €85-130/hr |
| Team size | 2-9 | Larger team: 50-249 |
| Location | Lyon, France | Lyon, France |
| Founded | 2019 | 2019 |
| Last reviewed | More recent review: Sep 10, 2026 | Sep 4, 2026 |
What we said about each
Our take on Qweri
The published reference list is long and specific for a practice this size, and it is measurement work: semantic SEO restructuring for the Mouratoglou Tennis Academy reported at 29% visibility growth in a year, a digital performance dashboard for the Caisse des Dépôts, an internal search audit for Cultura, tagging plans and GDPR-compliant mobile tracking for RAS Intérim. Read the machine-learning page carefully before shortlisting: what is described is feeding high-value conversion signals into…
Reviewed Sep 10, 2026
Read the full assessment →Our take on Yield Studio
One published study carries the AI: the Greensight module built into Greenscope's ESG platform analyzes documents and auto-fills questionnaires, and the study reports report-editing time cut to under 30 minutes across a platform serving 5,000-plus companies. The BTP Consultants engagement is the larger delivery—a platform for 1,150 field staff reporting 95% lower maintenance costs and 20% higher productivity—but the write-up describes no AI in it, and the remaining studies are mobile and web…
Reviewed Sep 4, 2026
Read the full assessment →Best for
Where each agency measurably leads on the published data — team capacity, declared specializations, editorial scoring, and rates where both publish them. Use these to match an agency to your project priorities.
Choose Qweri if you need
- closer collaboration at a smaller team scale
- disclosed specialization in E-commerce
- broader service offering — also covers AI Consulting and AI SEO
Choose Yield Studio if you need
- larger team capacity for multi-stream or enterprise-scale programs
- disclosed specialization in Healthcare / FinTech
- broader service offering — also covers Generative AI and AI Agents
- a higher overall editorial score
Strengths and watch-outs
Both upsides and risks, straight from our editorial assessments.
Qweri
Strengths
- Published entry prices with the conditions attached, so a first engagement can be scoped before a call
- Reference pages span analytics, tagging, SEO, scraping and data training, each tied to a named client rather than an industry label
- Data protection is treated as part of delivery, including a GDPR-compliant mobile tagging plan and a named data protection officer certification
Watch-outs
- No engagement published here builds or deploys a model—if you need an AI system rather than better marketing data, this is the wrong shortlist
- The site describes a team of three while the registry lists a larger band; confirm who would actually run your project
- Reference pages report visibility and delivery, rarely revenue—agree which commercial metric the work will be judged on
Yield Studio
Strengths
- The AI stack is published—GPT, Claude and Mistral alongside PyTorch and scikit-learn on AWS and GCP—so a technical buyer knows what is on the shelf before the first call
- Client outcomes are stated as numbers throughout the portfolio: 94% more downloads for CPZou, 25% operational efficiency for Chronos, three-month delivery for Kinnarps
- Named French mid-market and enterprise clients in volume, with a Lyon office at 15 Rue des Cuirassiers rather than a virtual address
Watch-outs
- The site states more than 55 senior experts while this listing records 10-49—confirm current headcount and how many are AI engineers rather than product developers
- The internal R&D lab dates AI in production to 2024; ask for the AI engagements delivered since then, with clients you can call
- BTP Consultants is presented as an AI reference on the AI service page while its case study describes no AI—ask which part of that platform is model-driven
Service coverage
Where the two overlap, and where each covers ground the other does not.
Industry coverage
Where the two overlap, and where each covers ground the other does not.
Pricing math
What a 12-week engagement at one full-time equivalent (~480 hours) costs at each agency’s published rate. An arithmetic projection, not a quote — real scopes move with seniority mix and team shape.
Qweri
Contact for rates
Yield Studio
Rate: €85-130/hr
€40,800–€62,400
Only Yield Studio publishes a rate, so there is no gap to measure. Qweri quotes per engagement — ask for a rate card early, since a comparison that starts on scope and ends on price tends to end late.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more SaaS & B2B experience, Qweri or Yield Studio?
- Both agencies show documented SaaS & B2B work. Yield Studio has the broader industry stack overall, with disclosed experience in Healthcare, FinTech beyond their shared focus.
- Which scores higher overall, Qweri or Yield Studio?
- Yield Studio scores 51/100, 2.2 points higher than Qweri at 48.8/100. See our methodology for how scores are calculated.
- Which is faster to engage, Qweri or Yield Studio?
- Neither publishes lead times, so this is a read on team size rather than a measured answer. Qweri runs the smaller team, which usually means fewer procurement gates and a shorter path to kickoff. Yield Studio runs a larger one, which tends to mean more steps but more capacity to start parallel workstreams. Current kickoff availability is the number that actually decides it — ask both.
- When should I consider both Qweri and Yield Studio?
- Consider running parallel discovery briefs with Qweri and Yield Studio if your project spans multiple workstreams, you want competitive proposals to compare scope and approach, or you're undecided between the specialization angles each brings (see the Best for cards above). Most engagements ultimately go with one — but the parallel-brief phase is a low-cost way to validate fit.
Read the full reviews
A side-by-side is a starting point. The full assessments carry the portfolio analysis, documented engagements, and the evidence behind every strength and watch-out above.