Agency Comparison
Modulai vs Talking to me
Two top-rated AI Consulting agencies in Stockholm.
Comparison updated August 2026
Side by side
Published data on both agencies. Where one side measurably differs, the dot marks it: the higher score, the lower published rate, the larger team, the more recent review. Which of those is an advantage depends on your brief.
| Attribute | Modulai | Talking to me |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | Higher score: 61.8/100 | 58/100 |
| Hourly rate | Contact for rates | Contact for rates |
| Team size | Larger team: 10-49 | |
| Location | Stockholm, Sweden | Stockholm, Sweden |
| Founded | 2018 | — |
| Last reviewed | Aug 5, 2026 | Aug 5, 2026 |
What we said about each
Our take on Modulai
The most technically specific portfolio in this register, and the one where a reader with a machine-learning background learns the most. The NovoNordisk work is a multi-agent retrieval system for clinical trial evidence that retrieves, analyzes and returns results in the right format while keeping traceability—the case index names the client, though the study itself describes it as one of Europe's largest pharmaceutical companies. For an unnamed American software company it built a Bayesian…
Reviewed Aug 5, 2026
Read the full assessment →Our take on Talking to me
A conversational AI practice with an enterprise client list that would flatter a firm three times its size: ATG, Telia, Nordea, Volvo, Hertz, Unionen. Three engagements are published. The ATG assistant makes complex betting data legible for V85 horse racing, a domain where the data is genuinely dense.
Reviewed Aug 5, 2026
Read the full assessment →Best for
Where each agency measurably leads on the published data — team capacity, declared specializations, editorial scoring, and rates where both publish them. Use these to match an agency to your project priorities.
Choose Modulai if you need
- larger team capacity for multi-stream or enterprise-scale programs
- disclosed specialization in Healthcare / Manufacturing
- a higher overall editorial score
Choose Talking to me if you need
- closer collaboration at a smaller team scale
- disclosed specialization in SaaS & B2B
Strengths and watch-outs
Both upsides and risks, straight from our editorial assessments.
Modulai
Strengths
- Names its models and its reasoning—Bayesian hierarchical regression, multimodal RAG, CPU-optimized detection—rather than describing capabilities
- Klarna and Novo Nordisk among named clients, which is a rare pairing of consumer fintech and regulated pharma
- Publishes method openly, including how it evaluates retrieval quality, so the engineering standard is checkable before you engage
Watch-outs
- More than a dozen published cases and no outcome figure in any of them—this team documents how it works, not what it earned
- A 30-plus engineering team taking research-grade problems; confirm capacity and timeline before committing to a deadline
Talking to me
Strengths
- Enterprise references across Swedish banking, telecoms and automotive—Nordea, Telia, Volvo—not just startups
- The Verbum engagement is built around answer accuracy and source transparency, which is the right concern for retrieval over regulation
- Ships on its own platform with named products, so the delivery model is consistent rather than assembled per project
Watch-outs
- No outcome figures in any published case—ask what the ATG and JABS assistants changed for their operators
- No team size or founding year published; two offices are stated and the scale behind them is not
Service coverage
Both agencies cover the same services — on this axis there is nothing to separate them, so decide on the evidence behind the work rather than its labels.
Industry coverage
Where the two overlap, and where each covers ground the other does not.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more FinTech experience, Modulai or Talking to me?
- Both agencies show documented FinTech work. Modulai has the broader industry stack overall, with disclosed experience in Healthcare, Manufacturing beyond their shared focus.
- Which scores higher overall, Modulai or Talking to me?
- Modulai scores 61.8/100, 3.8 points higher than Talking to me at 58/100. Both portfolio quality and business credibility feed into the score — see our methodology for the full breakdown.
- When should I consider both Modulai and Talking to me?
- Consider running parallel discovery briefs with Modulai and Talking to me if your project spans multiple workstreams, you want competitive proposals to compare scope and approach, or you're undecided between the specialization angles each brings (see the Best for cards above). Most engagements ultimately go with one — but the parallel-brief phase is a low-cost way to validate fit.
Read the full reviews
A side-by-side is a starting point. The full assessments carry the portfolio analysis, documented engagements, and the evidence behind every strength and watch-out above.