Comparison updated · Newest review
Side by side
Published data on both agencies. Where one side measurably differs, the dot marks it: the higher score, the lower published rate, the larger team, the more recent review. Which of those is an advantage depends on your brief.
| Attribute | Klingit | peoly |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | Higher score: 52.8/100 | 48.8/100 |
| Hourly rate | Contact for rates | Contact for rates |
| Team size | Larger team: 50-249 | 10-49 |
| Location | Stockholm, Sweden | Prague, Czech Republic |
| Founded | 2021 | 2019 |
| Last reviewed | Aug 5, 2026 | More recent review: Sep 20, 2026 |
What we said about each
Our take on Klingit
A creative production company that delivers on subscription, and the reason it is listed here is narrow and specific: it produces campaign work generatively, and says so. The LOOP brief is explicit—create AI-generated video for a nicotine-pouch launch, fast and within budget—and the client's marketing director is quoted by name. Häxan, a Swedish household brand from the early 1900s, ran a Halloween campaign whose imagery was generated because a photoshoot was out of reach; its co-owner is…
Reviewed Aug 5, 2026
Read the full assessment →Our take on peoly
Twelve case-study summaries sit on the homepage and not one names the client: convolutional networks paired with custom illumination catching paint defects under 0. 1 mm at over 95 percent accuracy for an automotive manufacturer, a sound model diagnosing car faults at 98 percent accuracy, a visual-search microservice for a furniture platform. The productized side is more current and easier to check—five edge applications covering PPE detection, QR and barcode reading, shopping-cart tracking…
Reviewed Sep 20, 2026
Read the full assessment →Best for
Where each agency measurably leads on the published data — team capacity, declared specializations, editorial scoring, and rates where both publish them. Use these to match an agency to your project priorities.
Choose Klingit if you need
- larger team capacity for multi-stream or enterprise-scale programs
- disclosed specialization in Healthcare
- broader service offering — also covers AI Marketing and AI SEO
- a higher overall editorial score
Choose peoly if you need
- closer collaboration at a smaller team scale
- disclosed specialization in Manufacturing
- broader service offering — also covers AI Development and AI Automation
Strengths and watch-outs
Both upsides and risks, straight from our editorial assessments.
Klingit
Strengths
- Two named-client campaigns where generative production is the delivery method, both with attributed client quotes explaining the cost case
- An in-house generation engine tuned to a brand's own assets, rather than generic tooling applied per project
- A subscription model with 80-plus creatives, which suits continuous campaign output rather than one-off projects
Watch-outs
- This is production, not engineering—there is no system delivered and no model built for you
- Most of the portfolio is conventional design and brand work; the AI is a method inside it, not the offer
peoly
Strengths
- Two client quotes carry outcomes: GasNet describes a proof of concept that became a production document-processing system, and The Diamond Pro reports around 6,000 hours saved a year
- The edge apps are downloadable with installation guides and interface screenshots dated August 2025, so the product line can be tested on an Axis camera before anything is signed
- Methods are named rather than hidden behind 'proprietary AI': TensorFlow Lite on Android, TensorRT and DeepStream on NVIDIA GPUs, approximate-nearest-neighbor visual search on Kubernetes
Watch-outs
- Ask for the surname and track record of whoever would lead your build—the leadership page lists eight people by first name only, including the Head of AI and the AI/ML team lead
- Delivery runs from development centers in Vinnytsia and Lviv under a Prague head office—confirm where your team would sit, who signs the contract and what the continuity plan is
- No rate or minimum engagement is published anywhere—settle the commercial frame early, and ask whether you are buying an ACAP app license, a scoped build or a monthly team
Service coverage
Where the two overlap, and where each covers ground the other does not.
Industry coverage
Where the two overlap, and where each covers ground the other does not.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more E-commerce experience, Klingit or peoly?
- Both agencies show documented E-commerce work and have similar industry breadth. Compare directly on the agency profiles: Klingit and peoly.
- Which scores higher overall, Klingit or peoly?
- Klingit scores 52.8/100, 4 points higher than peoly at 48.8/100. Both portfolio quality and business credibility feed into the score — see our methodology for the full breakdown.
- Which is faster to engage, Klingit or peoly?
- Neither publishes lead times, so this is a read on team size rather than a measured answer. peoly runs the smaller team, which usually means fewer procurement gates and a shorter path to kickoff. Klingit runs a larger one, which tends to mean more steps but more capacity to start parallel workstreams. Current kickoff availability is the number that actually decides it — ask both.
- When should I consider both Klingit and peoly?
- Consider running parallel discovery briefs with Klingit and peoly if your project spans multiple workstreams, you want competitive proposals to compare scope and approach, or you're undecided between the specialization angles each brings (see the Best for cards above). Most engagements ultimately go with one — but the parallel-brief phase is a low-cost way to validate fit.
Read the full reviews
A side-by-side is a starting point. The full assessments carry the portfolio analysis, documented engagements, and the evidence behind every strength and watch-out above.