Comparison updated
Side by side
Published data on both agencies. Where one side measurably differs, the dot marks it: the higher score, the lower published rate, the larger team, the more recent review. Which of those is an advantage depends on your brief.
| Attribute | Faculty | Imobisoft |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | Higher score: 73.3/100 | 64/100 |
| Hourly rate | Contact for rates | €45-85/hr |
| Team size | Larger team: 10-49 | |
| Location | London, United Kingdom | London, United Kingdom |
| Founded | 2014 | 2009 |
| Last reviewed | Aug 4, 2026 | More recent review: Sep 4, 2026 |
What we said about each
Our take on Faculty
Published case studies show systems that survived scrutiny most agencies never face—the NHS AI Lab's model-validation process for clinical AI, deployed generative-AI tooling inside Tide's support operation, and an LLM-backed recommender that now sources 25% of Axiom Law's hires. The published work index spans defense, energy, insurance, and government, though many entries are anonymized or brief. Rates are not published and the engagement profile is institutional—expect procurement-grade…
Reviewed Aug 4, 2026
Read the full assessment →Our take on Imobisoft
Two named clients, two systems in operational use: the M-PREG platform built for MirZyme Therapeutics scores preeclampsia risk at a stated 93% diagnostic accuracy and carries UKCA marking, and Hydraclean's Legionella compliance platform generates structured risk assessments and reports that replaced a paper inspection process. A third study describes two models for an unnamed petrochemical company—one analyzing competitors' published sustainability reports, one predicting how single indicator…
Reviewed Sep 4, 2026
Read the full assessment →Best for
Where each agency measurably leads on the published data — team capacity, declared specializations, editorial scoring, and rates where both publish them. Use these to match an agency to your project priorities.
Choose Faculty if you need
- closer collaboration at a smaller team scale
- disclosed specialization in Public Sector / Legal
- broader service offering — also covers AI Automation and AI Agents
- a higher overall editorial score
Choose Imobisoft if you need
- larger team capacity for multi-stream or enterprise-scale programs
- disclosed specialization in Manufacturing / E-commerce
Strengths and watch-outs
Both upsides and risks, straight from our editorial assessments.
Faculty
Strengths
- Published 10% ticket-handling-time reduction at Tide, with the deployed tools named (AgentAssist, MemberSummarise on Amazon Bedrock)
- Applied AI since 2014 with an in-house fellowship talent pipeline—delivery here predates the LLM wave
- NHS England's deputy director of AI is quoted crediting the validation work in the published study
Watch-outs
- Much of the work index is anonymized (military, challenger bank)—ask for a speakable reference in your sector
- No published rates; budget for institutional procurement timelines
Imobisoft
Strengths
- Regulated-market delivery is evidenced rather than claimed: the diagnostic platform went through conformity assessment, which constrains how the model can change after release
- €45–85/h against the €100–200/h EU band, from a 17-year entity with offices in Coventry and London
- The client wall names GSK, Sky, SABIC, the BBC, Dunelm and Northern Gas Networks—large-account delivery experience to test in the first call
Watch-outs
- GSK, Sky and the BBC appear as logos while the published AI studies belong to smaller clients—ask which named account the AI team actually delivered
- The ESG study's client is anonymized and its outcomes are directional rather than numeric—ask for a reference and the measured movement in the score
- Team structure is not published—confirm whether the people who built the regulated diagnostic platform would be on your engagement
Service coverage
Where the two overlap, and where each covers ground the other does not.
Industry coverage
Where the two overlap, and where each covers ground the other does not.
Pricing math
What a 12-week engagement at one full-time equivalent (~480 hours) costs at each agency’s published rate. An arithmetic projection, not a quote — real scopes move with seniority mix and team shape.
Faculty
Contact for rates
Imobisoft
Rate: €45-85/hr
€21,600–€40,800
Only Imobisoft publishes a rate, so there is no gap to measure. Faculty quotes per engagement — ask for a rate card early, since a comparison that starts on scope and ends on price tends to end late.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more Healthcare experience, Faculty or Imobisoft?
- Both agencies show documented Healthcare work. Faculty has the broader industry stack overall, with disclosed experience in Public Sector, Legal, FinTech beyond their shared focus.
- Which scores higher overall, Faculty or Imobisoft?
- Faculty scores 73.3/100, 9.3 points higher than Imobisoft at 64/100. Both portfolio quality and business credibility feed into the score — see our methodology for the full breakdown.
- When should I consider both Faculty and Imobisoft?
- Consider running parallel discovery briefs with Faculty and Imobisoft if your project spans multiple workstreams, you want competitive proposals to compare scope and approach, or you're undecided between the specialization angles each brings (see the Best for cards above). Most engagements ultimately go with one — but the parallel-brief phase is a low-cost way to validate fit.
Read the full reviews
A side-by-side is a starting point. The full assessments carry the portfolio analysis, documented engagements, and the evidence behind every strength and watch-out above.