Agency Comparison
CGP Systems vs Geneea
Two top-rated AI Automation agencies in Prague.
Comparison updated
Side by side
Published data on both agencies. Where one side measurably differs, the dot marks it: the higher score, the lower published rate, the larger team, the more recent review. Which of those is an advantage depends on your brief.
| Attribute | CGP Systems | Geneea |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 47/100 | Higher score: 61.8/100 |
| Hourly rate | €45-85/hr | Contact for rates |
| Team size | 10-49 | 10-49 |
| Location | Prague, Czech Republic | Prague, Czech Republic |
| Founded | 2015 | 2014 |
| Last reviewed | Sep 3, 2026 | Sep 3, 2026 |
What we said about each
Our take on CGP Systems
CGP Systems has shipped four consumer apps to production for two client publishers: DesignSense AI (100K+ Android installs) turns a photo into interior and exterior design renders, and DeftPDF (50K+ installs) adds a GPT-4o chat-with-PDF feature to a 40-tool document suite, with Guardely and Colorcinch rounding out the portfolio. None of the four case studies document the chat and voice agents or back-office automation the site now positions as its core service, and the AI in the published work…
Reviewed Sep 3, 2026
Read the full assessment →Our take on Geneea
Geneea's published case studies show NLP running in production, not pilots: a personalization engine built with Recombee lifted Economia's conversion rate 64% and later expanded to the centrum. cz portal at over 50 million recommendation requests a month, and Heureka's daily-updated review summaries score 91% helpful across more than 2. 8 million reviews.
Reviewed Sep 3, 2026
Read the full assessment →Best for
Where each agency measurably leads on the published data — team capacity, declared specializations, editorial scoring, and rates where both publish them. Use these to match an agency to your project priorities.
Choose CGP Systems if you need
- broader service offering — also covers AI Agents
- an overall editorial score of 47/100
Choose Geneea if you need
- disclosed specialization in FinTech
- broader service offering — also covers AI Consulting
- a higher overall editorial score
Strengths and watch-outs
Both upsides and risks, straight from our editorial assessments.
CGP Systems
Strengths
- Published rate of €45–85/h sits well under the EU €100–200/h band for work that reached live app stores, not a pitch deck.
- Case studies document the full engagement scope—product strategy, cross-platform engineering, monetization and privacy posture—for each shipped app.
- Guardely's dataset (over 1 million tracked offender records) and Colorcinch's asset library (4 million-plus stock photos) show CGP shipping data-heavy features at real scale.
Watch-outs
- Ask for a reference client outside Sictec Infotech and Progresso Technology LLC—the four published case studies trace back to just two client companies.
- Ask who would staff a back-office automation or agent project—the site names no individual engineers, and none of the case studies cover that service line.
Geneea
Strengths
- Official technology-partner status with Stibo DX since 2025 puts Geneea's semantic tagging and RAG research assistant inside a live enterprise publishing platform (CUE), not a standalone tool.
- Hello bank!, a BNP Paribas digital bank serving 350,000 clients, credits the deployment with faster daily feedback triage and names its internal owner on record.
- Co-founders present original work at industry venues (WAN-IFRA AI Forum, FIBEP Tech Day) rather than marketing content alone.
Watch-outs
- Ask for the specific model or provider behind the 'RAG' and 'LLM' claims in newer products—published case studies name techniques, not model vendors or infrastructure.
- Radio France's location-mapping project grew out of a four-month 'Sandbox' program—confirm it is still running before citing it as an ongoing deployment.
- No published rates are visible on site—ask Geneea to benchmark directly against the EU €100–200/h band.
Service coverage
Where the two overlap, and where each covers ground the other does not.
Industry coverage
Where the two overlap, and where each covers ground the other does not.
Pricing math
What a 12-week engagement at one full-time equivalent (~480 hours) costs at each agency’s published rate. An arithmetic projection, not a quote — real scopes move with seniority mix and team shape.
CGP Systems
Rate: €45-85/hr
€21,600–€40,800
Geneea
Contact for rates
Only CGP Systems publishes a rate, so there is no gap to measure. Geneea quotes per engagement — ask for a rate card early, since a comparison that starts on scope and ends on price tends to end late.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more SaaS & B2B experience, CGP Systems or Geneea?
- Both agencies show documented SaaS & B2B work. Geneea has the broader industry stack overall, with disclosed experience in FinTech beyond their shared focus.
- Which scores higher overall, CGP Systems or Geneea?
- Geneea scores 61.8/100, 14.8 points higher than CGP Systems at 47/100. See our methodology for how scores are calculated.
- When should I consider both CGP Systems and Geneea?
- Consider running parallel discovery briefs with CGP Systems and Geneea if your project spans multiple workstreams, you want competitive proposals to compare scope and approach, or you're undecided between the specialization angles each brings (see the Best for cards above). Most engagements ultimately go with one — but the parallel-brief phase is a low-cost way to validate fit.
Read the full reviews
A side-by-side is a starting point. The full assessments carry the portfolio analysis, documented engagements, and the evidence behind every strength and watch-out above.