Agency Comparison
CGP Systems vs DataSentics
Two top-rated AI Development agencies in Prague.
Comparison updated
Side by side
Published data on both agencies. Where one side measurably differs, the dot marks it: the higher score, the lower published rate, the larger team, the more recent review. Which of those is an advantage depends on your brief.
| Attribute | CGP Systems | DataSentics |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 47/100 | Higher score: 74.8/100 |
| Hourly rate | €45-85/hr | Contact for rates |
| Team size | 10-49 | Larger team: 50-249 |
| Location | Prague, Czech Republic | Prague, Czech Republic |
| Founded | 2015 | 2016 |
| Last reviewed | Sep 3, 2026 | Sep 3, 2026 |
What we said about each
Our take on CGP Systems
CGP Systems has shipped four consumer apps to production for two client publishers: DesignSense AI (100K+ Android installs) turns a photo into interior and exterior design renders, and DeftPDF (50K+ installs) adds a GPT-4o chat-with-PDF feature to a 40-tool document suite, with Guardely and Colorcinch rounding out the portfolio. None of the four case studies document the chat and voice agents or back-office automation the site now positions as its core service, and the AI in the published work…
Reviewed Sep 3, 2026
Read the full assessment →Our take on DataSentics
DataSentics documents five named production deployments with the stack disclosed down to the model: a LightGBM fraud-detection model live on Databricks and AWS for 2. 35 million Esure customers, and an XGBoost and Elasticsearch product-matching pipeline processing tens of millions of Heureka offers a day at over 98% precision. A Databricks-based personalization system is credited with 1,000 additional advisor meetings at Česká Spořitelna (Erste Group) in three months, and the story is…
Reviewed Sep 3, 2026
Read the full assessment →Best for
Where each agency measurably leads on the published data — team capacity, declared specializations, editorial scoring, and rates where both publish them. Use these to match an agency to your project priorities.
Choose CGP Systems if you need
- closer collaboration at a smaller team scale
- disclosed specialization in SaaS & B2B
- broader service offering — also covers AI Agents and AI Automation
Choose DataSentics if you need
- larger team capacity for multi-stream or enterprise-scale programs
- disclosed specialization in FinTech / Healthcare
- broader service offering — also covers AI Consulting and Generative AI
- a higher overall editorial score
Strengths and watch-outs
Both upsides and risks, straight from our editorial assessments.
CGP Systems
Strengths
- Published rate of €45–85/h sits well under the EU €100–200/h band for work that reached live app stores, not a pitch deck.
- Case studies document the full engagement scope—product strategy, cross-platform engineering, monetization and privacy posture—for each shipped app.
- Guardely's dataset (over 1 million tracked offender records) and Colorcinch's asset library (4 million-plus stock photos) show CGP shipping data-heavy features at real scale.
Watch-outs
- Ask for a reference client outside Sictec Infotech and Progresso Technology LLC—the four published case studies trace back to just two client companies.
- Ask who would staff a back-office automation or agent project—the site names no individual engineers, and none of the case studies cover that service line.
DataSentics
Strengths
- Every case study lists the named engineer or lead behind the work, with a direct email and phone—Petr Dvořák, David Vopelka and Ondřej Havlíček among them.
- Databricks Elite Consulting Partner status is independent, verifiable corroboration of the platform expertise behind these case studies, not a self-reported claim.
- The Nestlé shelf-monitoring model runs at over 97% detection accuracy inside a live mobile app used by field sales reps, not a lab benchmark.
Watch-outs
- Confirm which legal entity signs the contract—DataSentics now operates inside the Eviden/Bull group rather than as an independent boutique.
- Ask for a reference case outside retail, insurance and banking—documented deployments cluster tightly there, plus one internal media-platform MLOps project.
- No rate is published on site—benchmark directly against the EU €100–200/h band before assuming group-vendor pricing.
Service coverage
Where the two overlap, and where each covers ground the other does not.
Industry coverage
Where the two overlap, and where each covers ground the other does not.
Pricing math
What a 12-week engagement at one full-time equivalent (~480 hours) costs at each agency’s published rate. An arithmetic projection, not a quote — real scopes move with seniority mix and team shape.
CGP Systems
Rate: €45-85/hr
€21,600–€40,800
DataSentics
Contact for rates
Only CGP Systems publishes a rate, so there is no gap to measure. DataSentics quotes per engagement — ask for a rate card early, since a comparison that starts on scope and ends on price tends to end late.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more E-commerce experience, CGP Systems or DataSentics?
- Both agencies show documented E-commerce work. DataSentics has the broader industry stack overall, with disclosed experience in FinTech, Healthcare beyond their shared focus.
- Which scores higher overall, CGP Systems or DataSentics?
- DataSentics scores 74.8/100, 27.8 points higher than CGP Systems at 47/100. See our methodology for how scores are calculated.
- Which is faster to engage, CGP Systems or DataSentics?
- Neither publishes lead times, so this is a read on team size rather than a measured answer. CGP Systems runs the smaller team, which usually means fewer procurement gates and a shorter path to kickoff. DataSentics runs a larger one, which tends to mean more steps but more capacity to start parallel workstreams. Current kickoff availability is the number that actually decides it — ask both.
- When should I consider both CGP Systems and DataSentics?
- Consider running parallel discovery briefs with CGP Systems and DataSentics if your project spans multiple workstreams, you want competitive proposals to compare scope and approach, or you're undecided between the specialization angles each brings (see the Best for cards above). Most engagements ultimately go with one — but the parallel-brief phase is a low-cost way to validate fit.
Read the full reviews
A side-by-side is a starting point. The full assessments carry the portfolio analysis, documented engagements, and the evidence behind every strength and watch-out above.