Skip to content

Agency Comparison

DevXHub vs Siili Solutions

Two top-rated AI Development agencies in Helsinki.

DevXHub

Helsinki, Finland

42/100

Siili Solutions

Helsinki, Finland

68/100

Comparison updated · Newest review

Side by side

Published data on both agencies. Where one side measurably differs, the dot marks it: the higher score, the lower published rate, the larger team, the more recent review. Which of those is an advantage depends on your brief.

AttributeDevXHubSiili Solutions
Editorial score42/100Higher score: 68/100
Hourly rateLower published rate: €20-40/hr€45-85/hr
Team size50-249Larger team: 250+
LocationHelsinki, FinlandHelsinki, Finland
Founded20202005
Last reviewedMore recent review: Sep 10, 2026Sep 7, 2026

What we said about each

Our take on DevXHub

The AI entries in the portfolio are builds for AI companies rather than AI built into a business: an all-in-one tools hub delivered in three months as design, backend and integration work, and a conversational platform in the same shape. No case study publishes a model choice, an evaluation or a result, so what is demonstrated is the ability to ship a product around someone else's models. Read the geography before shortlisting: the Helsinki presence is an office, and the company's own site puts…

Reviewed Sep 10, 2026

Read the full assessment →

Our take on Siili Solutions

Bobotin is the case to read: a retrieval-augmented agent in production at LähiTapiola Finance that drafts customer-service replies from contract terms and past responses, classifies complaints into regulated categories, works in Finnish, Swedish and English, and always leaves a human to check and send. It runs on Azure under GDPR and EU AI Act constraints, and Siili maintains it as an ongoing managed service rather than handing it over—the firm holds ISO/IEC 42001 certification for AI…

Reviewed Sep 7, 2026

Read the full assessment →

Best for

Where each agency measurably leads on the published data — team capacity, declared specializations, editorial scoring, and rates where both publish them. Use these to match an agency to your project priorities.

Choose DevXHub if you need

  • a more cost-effective engagement (~54% lower rate)
  • closer collaboration at a smaller team scale
  • disclosed specialization in SaaS & B2B / E-commerce
  • broader service offering — also covers AI Agents

Choose Siili Solutions if you need

  • larger team capacity for multi-stream or enterprise-scale programs
  • disclosed specialization in Public Sector / Manufacturing
  • broader service offering — also covers AI Automation
  • a higher overall editorial score

Strengths and watch-outs

Both upsides and risks, straight from our editorial assessments.

DevXHub

Strengths

  • A large published case library across e-commerce, analytics, ERP and internal tooling, so general delivery capability is easy to assess
  • Stated team of 55-plus with offices on three continents, which supports timezone coverage and staff augmentation arrangements

Watch-outs

  • No AI case study names a model, an evaluation method or an outcome—ask what was engineered versus integrated, and who made the model decisions
  • The Helsinki listing is an office and delivery is based elsewhere; confirm where your team sits, which entity contracts and how your data is handled
  • DevXHub publishes no rate itself; the €20-40/h shown here comes from a third-party directory listing and reflects an offshore delivery model

Siili Solutions

Strengths

  • A production AI agent in a regulated financial setting, documented with its architecture, its human checkpoint and the client's IT director on record
  • ISO/IEC 42001 certification for AI management systems, explained in practice in the case study rather than displayed as a logo
  • Operates the system as an ongoing managed service, so the question of who maintains it after launch has a published answer

Watch-outs

  • AI depth varies across the wider portfolio—ask which cases are AI delivery and which are digital-platform work
  • Around 900 people across 17 offices—ask where your team sits and who leads it
  • Bobotin's published results are directional rather than numeric—ask for the throughput figures before and after

Service coverage

Where the two overlap, and where each covers ground the other does not.

Only DevXHub

Only Siili Solutions

Industry coverage

Where the two overlap, and where each covers ground the other does not.

Only DevXHub

Both

Only Siili Solutions

Pricing math

What a 12-week engagement at one full-time equivalent (~480 hours) costs at each agency’s published rate. An arithmetic projection, not a quote — real scopes move with seniority mix and team shape.

DevXHub

Rate: €20-40/hr

€9,600–€19,200

Siili Solutions

Rate: €45-85/hr

€21,600–€40,800

At this scope the published midpoints are about €16,800 apart, with DevXHub lower. Siili Solutions publishes Public Sector work that DevXHub does not — that is the one difference on this page that bears on the gap. If your brief does not touch it, the gap is buying something this comparison cannot see.

Frequently asked questions

Which is cheaper, DevXHub or Siili Solutions?
DevXHub is cheaper by roughly 54% — €30/hr median vs €65/hr at Siili Solutions. Published rates cover different things at different agencies — seniority mix, discovery and included revisions are the usual variables — so treat the gap as a question to ask, not a verdict.
Which has more FinTech experience, DevXHub or Siili Solutions?
Both agencies show documented FinTech work and have similar industry breadth. Compare directly on the agency profiles: DevXHub and Siili Solutions.
Which scores higher overall, DevXHub or Siili Solutions?
Siili Solutions scores 68/100, 26 points higher than DevXHub at 42/100. See our methodology for how scores are calculated.
When should I consider both DevXHub and Siili Solutions?
Consider running parallel discovery briefs with DevXHub and Siili Solutions if your project spans multiple workstreams, you want competitive proposals to compare scope and approach, or you're undecided between the specialization angles each brings (see the Best for cards above). Most engagements ultimately go with one — but the parallel-brief phase is a low-cost way to validate fit.

Read the full reviews

A side-by-side is a starting point. The full assessments carry the portfolio analysis, documented engagements, and the evidence behind every strength and watch-out above.

Comparison last updated . Most recently reviewed: DevXHub on . How we rank