Agency Comparison
Apertia Tech vs DataSentics
Two top-rated AI Development agencies in Prague.
Comparison updated · Newest review
Side by side
Published data on both agencies. Where one side measurably differs, the dot marks it: the higher score, the lower published rate, the larger team, the more recent review. Which of those is an advantage depends on your brief.
| Attribute | Apertia Tech | DataSentics |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 48.8/100 | Higher score: 74.8/100 |
| Hourly rate | Contact for rates | Contact for rates |
| Team size | 10-49 | Larger team: 50-249 |
| Location | Prague, Czech Republic | Prague, Czech Republic |
| Founded | 2019 | 2016 |
| Last reviewed | More recent review: Sep 9, 2026 | Sep 3, 2026 |
What we said about each
Our take on Apertia Tech
Twenty-three case studies, three of them AI flagships with hard numbers: a wholesaler's purchasing and inventory system with demand prediction at a stated 30 percent cost reduction, a voice agent wired into a CRM resolving 90 percent of inquiries without an operator at a three-second average response, and invoice extraction at 98 percent accuracy and five seconds a document against five minutes by hand. Every one of those clients is anonymized by sector—a wholesale company, a finance…
Reviewed Sep 9, 2026
Read the full assessment →Our take on DataSentics
DataSentics documents five named production deployments with the stack disclosed down to the model: a LightGBM fraud-detection model live on Databricks and AWS for 2. 35 million Esure customers, and an XGBoost and Elasticsearch product-matching pipeline processing tens of millions of Heureka offers a day at over 98% precision. A Databricks-based personalization system is credited with 1,000 additional advisor meetings at Česká Spořitelna (Erste Group) in three months, and the story is…
Reviewed Sep 3, 2026
Read the full assessment →Best for
Where each agency measurably leads on the published data — team capacity, declared specializations, editorial scoring, and rates where both publish them. Use these to match an agency to your project priorities.
Choose Apertia Tech if you need
- closer collaboration at a smaller team scale
- disclosed specialization in Manufacturing / SaaS & B2B
- broader service offering — also covers AI Agents and AI Automation
Choose DataSentics if you need
- larger team capacity for multi-stream or enterprise-scale programs
- disclosed specialization in FinTech / Healthcare
- broader service offering — also covers AI Consulting and Generative AI
- a higher overall editorial score
Strengths and watch-outs
Both upsides and risks, straight from our editorial assessments.
Apertia Tech
Strengths
- Three AI engagements publish hard numbers: 30 percent purchasing cost reduction, 90 percent of support inquiries resolved without an operator, 98 percent invoice extraction accuracy
- The AI sits on enterprise resource planning and CRM systems the same team implements, so the integration question is answered before it is asked
- The site states its disclosure policy—return figures for the unnumbered studies available under a non-disclosure agreement—rather than leaving the gap unexplained
Watch-outs
- All three numbered flagships are anonymized by sector—ask for a reference you can call, since the numbers are the reason to shortlist
- TRIDO, Dr. Max and the other named clients carry no described engagement; ask which of them runs an AI system rather than an ERP
- The site is published in Czech only—confirm working language and support hours before a cross-border engagement
DataSentics
Strengths
- Every case study lists the named engineer or lead behind the work, with a direct email and phone—Petr Dvořák, David Vopelka and Ondřej Havlíček among them.
- Databricks Elite Consulting Partner status is independent, verifiable corroboration of the platform expertise behind these case studies, not a self-reported claim.
- The Nestlé shelf-monitoring model runs at over 97% detection accuracy inside a live mobile app used by field sales reps, not a lab benchmark.
Watch-outs
- Confirm which legal entity signs the contract—DataSentics now operates inside the Eviden/Bull group rather than as an independent boutique.
- Ask for a reference case outside retail, insurance and banking—documented deployments cluster tightly there, plus one internal media-platform MLOps project.
- No rate is published on site—benchmark against the European range on our rate index before assuming group-vendor pricing.
Service coverage
Where the two overlap, and where each covers ground the other does not.
Industry coverage
Where the two overlap, and where each covers ground the other does not.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more E-commerce experience, Apertia Tech or DataSentics?
- Both agencies show documented E-commerce work and have similar industry breadth. Compare directly on the agency profiles: Apertia Tech and DataSentics.
- Which scores higher overall, Apertia Tech or DataSentics?
- DataSentics scores 74.8/100, 26 points higher than Apertia Tech at 48.8/100. See our methodology for how scores are calculated.
- Which is faster to engage, Apertia Tech or DataSentics?
- Neither publishes lead times, so this is a read on team size rather than a measured answer. Apertia Tech runs the smaller team, which usually means fewer procurement gates and a shorter path to kickoff. DataSentics runs a larger one, which tends to mean more steps but more capacity to start parallel workstreams. Current kickoff availability is the number that actually decides it — ask both.
- When should I consider both Apertia Tech and DataSentics?
- Consider running parallel discovery briefs with Apertia Tech and DataSentics if your project spans multiple workstreams, you want competitive proposals to compare scope and approach, or you're undecided between the specialization angles each brings (see the Best for cards above). Most engagements ultimately go with one — but the parallel-brief phase is a low-cost way to validate fit.
Read the full reviews
A side-by-side is a starting point. The full assessments carry the portfolio analysis, documented engagements, and the evidence behind every strength and watch-out above.