# Spanish Point Technologies vs Square Root Solutions

> Two top-rated AI Development agencies in Dublin. Side by side: published rates, team size, service and industry coverage, and the curator's assessment of both — pairings are never sold.

Canonical page: https://www.aiagencies.eu/compare/spanish-point-technologies-vs-square-root-solutions
Generated: 2026-09-17 · Curated by Gabor Kiss · No paid placements — inclusion, score, and rank are never sold.

## Facts
| | Spanish Point Technologies | Square Root Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 65.8/100 | 64/100 |
| Hourly rate | not published | €20-40/hr (directory-listed) |
| Team size | 50-249 | 10-49 |
| Location | Dublin, Ireland | Dublin, Ireland |
| Founded | 2005 | 2018 |
| Last reviewed | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-16 |
| Services | AI Development, AI Consulting | AI Development, Generative AI |
| Industries | SaaS & B2B, Public Sector | Healthcare, E-commerce, SaaS & B2B |

## Our take on Spanish Point Technologies
Reviewed 2026-09-16 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

The AI evidence sits in the Matching Engine, Spanish Point's own music-rights platform, live across 13 markets that distribute €2.6 billion in royalties a year: CISAC commissioned a fraud-detection build on Azure Databricks and Cognitive Services, with a model the firm trained on similarity to famous works, creator tenure and submission rates.

That study is explicit that the model is a pilot now being folded into the product—the 98% auto-match and 70% faster processing figures belong to the platform rather than to the model—so what the evidence shows is production infrastructure with an ML feature maturing inside it.

The rest of the named portfolio is Microsoft platform delivery rather than AI: the Patient Access Management System at the National Treatment Purchase Fund has handled 160,000 patients across 58 hospitals in five years, and Kefron came off 70-plus servers onto weekly releases with a 25% rise in NPS.

The weaker fit is buyers who want a model built outside the Microsoft stack, or who need the AI itself—not the platform beneath it—to be the part already running at scale.

### Key strengths
- Six client executives are quoted by name and title across the published projects, including the NTPF's ICT and process-innovation directors and Kefron's CFO
- Ten Microsoft Ireland Partner of the Year awards since 2020, Azure Expert MSP status and a Deloitte Technology Fast 50 place in 2025, with company registration number and Dublin address on-site
- The NTPF build documents its security work—NIST standards, Entra ID single sign-on with per-hospital data scoping, CISO and DPO involved through tendering—not just the feature list

### Good to know
- The 70–90% reduction in manual invoice processing on the Kefron page is Kefron AP's own product capability, named as such in that study—ask which numbers the engagement itself moved
- Machine learning appears in one of the eight published projects—ask how many of the 100-plus engineers work on models rather than platform, low-code and DevOps delivery
- Delivery is Microsoft-anchored throughout, with Databricks the one exception—confirm the stack early if your data already lives elsewhere

## Our take on Square Root Solutions
Reviewed 2026-09-16 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

The Druid Learning build is the one to read: a content-intelligence platform with the stack published in full—transformer classifiers and spaCy named-entity recognition for topic labeling across 140+ languages, OCR and PDF parsing to split assets out of legacy files, Airflow and Kafka for resumable batch runs—and a client testimonial on the same page calling it the indexing and categorization engine their product depends on, at 500k+ assets processed.

EduSmart Planner for CJ Fallon is the second substantial one, parsing curriculum PDFs into month-wise plans and generating lesson plans and quizzes at 250+ schools and 4,500+ teachers, though the AI there is Eden AI and ChatGPT called through their APIs rather than anything trained—a different kind of engineering from the Druid work, and worth knowing which one you are buying.

Read the rest of the portfolio for what it is: more than twenty projects, most of them mobile and web product builds where AI is one feature, and the outcome percentages beside them come from the agency with no measurement method attached.

The weaker fit is buyers who need to meet the people doing the modeling—the leadership page names eight, four of them in marketing or account roles and none identified as a machine-learning engineer, against a published figure of 150+ engineers, so ask who architects your model work and where they sit.

### Key strengths
- Certified to ISO/IEC 42001:2023 for AI management, an independently audited standard rather than a self-declared responsible-AI policy
- Client voices are attributable: six named founders and CEOs with photographs, plus four client video testimonials covering the Bergo and Leaving Cert Plus work
- Project budget bands are published on the contact form, from €10,000 to €120,000 and above, so you can size the engagement before the first call

### Good to know
- The site publishes no rate—the €20–40/h shown here sits well below the European range on our rate index, so confirm which office staffs your build and at what seniority
- AI depth varies sharply across the portfolio: Druid Learning is model engineering, EduSmart is API orchestration—ask which of the two your project resembles before agreeing a price
- The published outcome percentages carry no method or measurement window—ask how 40% higher engagement or 75% time saved was measured, and over how long

## Which to choose
Choose Spanish Point Technologies for:
- larger team capacity for multi-stream or enterprise-scale programs
- disclosed specialization in Public Sector
- broader service offering — also covers AI Consulting

Choose Square Root Solutions for:
- closer collaboration at a smaller team scale
- disclosed specialization in Healthcare / E-commerce
- broader service offering — also covers Generative AI

## Questions buyers ask

### Which has more SaaS & B2B experience, Spanish Point Technologies or Square Root Solutions?
Both agencies show documented SaaS & B2B work. Square Root Solutions has the broader industry stack overall, with disclosed experience in Healthcare, E-commerce beyond their shared focus.

### Which scores higher overall, Spanish Point Technologies or Square Root Solutions?
Spanish Point Technologies scores 65.8/100, 1.8 points higher than Square Root Solutions at 64/100. Both portfolio quality and business credibility feed into the score — see our methodology for the full breakdown.

### Which is faster to engage, Spanish Point Technologies or Square Root Solutions?
Neither publishes lead times, so this is a read on team size rather than a measured answer. Square Root Solutions runs the smaller team, which usually means fewer procurement gates and a shorter path to kickoff. Spanish Point Technologies runs a larger one, which tends to mean more steps but more capacity to start parallel workstreams. Current kickoff availability is the number that actually decides it — ask both.

### When should I consider both Spanish Point Technologies and Square Root Solutions?
Consider running parallel discovery briefs with Spanish Point Technologies and Square Root Solutions if your project spans multiple workstreams, you want competitive proposals to compare scope and approach, or you're undecided between the specialization angles each brings (see the Best for cards above). Most engagements ultimately go with one — but the parallel-brief phase is a low-cost way to validate fit.

---
Source: AIAgencies.eu — the curated register of European AI agencies. Rate provenance: "agency-confirmed" = disclosed via submission or claimed profile; "directory-listed" = Clutch or two agreeing B2B directories (lone unverified sources are never written). Full method: https://www.aiagencies.eu/methodology · Rate index: https://www.aiagencies.eu/rates