# Siili Solutions vs Solita

> Two top-rated AI Consulting agencies in Helsinki. Side by side: published rates, team size, service and industry coverage, and the curator's assessment of both — pairings are never sold.

Canonical page: https://www.aiagencies.eu/compare/siili-solutions-vs-solita
Generated: 2026-09-17 · Curated by Gabor Kiss · No paid placements — inclusion, score, and rank are never sold.

## Facts
| | Siili Solutions | Solita |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Hourly rate | €45-85/hr (directory-listed) | €45-85/hr (directory-listed) |
| Team size | 250+ | 250+ |
| Location | Helsinki, Finland | Helsinki, Finland |
| Founded | 2005 | 1996 |
| Last reviewed | 2026-09-07 | 2026-09-07 |
| Services | AI Consulting, AI Development, AI Automation | AI Consulting, AI Development, Generative AI, AI Automation |
| Industries | FinTech, Public Sector, Manufacturing | Manufacturing, Public Sector, FinTech |

## Our take on Siili Solutions
Reviewed 2026-09-07 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

Bobotin is the case to read: a retrieval-augmented agent in production at LähiTapiola Finance that drafts customer-service replies from contract terms and past responses, classifies complaints into regulated categories, works in Finnish, Swedish and English, and always leaves a human to check and send.

It runs on Azure under GDPR and EU AI Act constraints, and Siili maintains it as an ongoing managed service rather than handing it over—the firm holds ISO/IEC 42001 certification for AI management systems and states it was the first listed Finnish company to be granted it.

Around 900 people across 17 offices from Helsinki to Detroit, listed since 2005, with the wider published portfolio running to broader digital delivery—Wärtsilä, Finavia, Elisa, Aalto University—where the AI content varies case by case.

The weaker fit is a buyer who wants a small specialist team; the argument here is governance and scale, which is worth paying for inside a regulated setting and worth questioning outside one.

### Key strengths
- A production AI agent in a regulated financial setting, documented with its architecture, its human checkpoint and the client's IT director on record
- ISO/IEC 42001 certification for AI management systems, explained in practice in the case study rather than displayed as a logo
- Operates the system as an ongoing managed service, so the question of who maintains it after launch has a published answer

### Good to know
- AI depth varies across the wider portfolio—ask which cases are AI delivery and which are digital-platform work
- Around 900 people across 17 offices—ask where your team sits and who leads it
- Bobotin's published results are directional rather than numeric—ask for the throughput figures before and after

## Our take on Solita
Reviewed 2026-09-07 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

The KONE engagement is the one to read: sensor data and machine learning feeding predictive maintenance across more than 150,000 elevators, published with 40% fewer repair call-outs, 70% of faults identified before they occur and 50% fewer entrapments, with KONE's own data science manager on record about what Solita's people contributed.

Public-sector delivery is unusually well evidenced for this market—an adverse-drug-reaction application in production at the Finnish Medicines Agency with two named regulator staff quoted, an AI strategy for Kela, Finland's social insurance institution, and responsible-AI training delivered to NATO leadership.

At 2,200 people across eight countries and founded in 1996, this is a consultancy rather than a specialist shop, and the published range runs from strategy engagements to production analytics—the ISS study's "100x faster prototyping" sits at the softer end of that spread.

The weaker fit is a buyer who wants the founders on the build; at this size the question that matters is which team you get, not whether the firm has done it before.

### Key strengths
- The KONE predictive-maintenance work publishes three operational numbers and names the client's own data science lead
- Regulated public-sector delivery with named references: a production application at the Finnish Medicines Agency, AI strategy for Kela, responsible-AI training for NATO
- 2,200 people across Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Germany, Belgium, Poland, the UK and Switzerland, so multi-country delivery is in-house

### Good to know
- Several published studies are strategy or enablement rather than shipped systems—ask which of them ended in something running in production
- At this scale the named team decides the outcome; ask who specifically staffs your engagement and what they last shipped
- €45–85/h for enterprise AI—confirm what that rate covers and where the work is performed

## Which to choose
Choose Siili Solutions for:
- an overall editorial score of 68/100

Choose Solita for:
- broader service offering — also covers Generative AI
- an overall editorial score of 68/100

## Questions buyers ask

### Which is cheaper, Siili Solutions or Solita?
Pricing is comparable: Siili Solutions at €65/hr median vs Solita at €65/hr. Choose on specialization rather than cost.

### Which has more FinTech experience, Siili Solutions or Solita?
Both agencies show documented FinTech work and have similar industry breadth. Compare directly on the agency profiles: Siili Solutions and Solita.

### Which scores higher overall, Siili Solutions or Solita?
Both score equally well overall (68/100). The deciding factor is specialization — see the editorial quotes and Strengths sections above. Full methodology.

### When should I consider both Siili Solutions and Solita?
Consider running parallel discovery briefs with Siili Solutions and Solita if your project spans multiple workstreams, you want competitive proposals to compare scope and approach, or you're undecided between the specialization angles each brings (see the Best for cards above). Most engagements ultimately go with one — but the parallel-brief phase is a low-cost way to validate fit.

---
Source: AIAgencies.eu — the curated register of European AI agencies. Rate provenance: "agency-confirmed" = disclosed via submission or claimed profile; "directory-listed" = Clutch or two agreeing B2B directories (lone unverified sources are never written). Full method: https://www.aiagencies.eu/methodology · Rate index: https://www.aiagencies.eu/rates