# OstraconAI vs Siili Solutions

> Two top-rated AI Consulting agencies in Helsinki. Side by side: published rates, team size, service and industry coverage, and the curator's assessment of both — pairings are never sold.

Canonical page: https://www.aiagencies.eu/compare/ostraconai-vs-siili-solutions
Generated: 2026-09-23 · Curated by Gabor Kiss · No paid placements — inclusion, score, and rank are never sold.

## Facts
| | OstraconAI | Siili Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 60/100 | 68/100 |
| Hourly rate | €250-400/hr (agency-confirmed) | €45-85/hr (directory-listed) |
| Team size | 10-49 | 250+ |
| Location | Helsinki, Finland | Helsinki, Finland |
| Founded | 2024 | 2005 |
| Last reviewed | 2026-09-23 | 2026-09-07 |
| Services | AI Consulting, AI Marketing, AI Automation | AI Consulting, AI Development, AI Automation |
| Industries | Healthcare, E-commerce, SaaS & B2B, FinTech | FinTech, Public Sector, Manufacturing |

## Our take on OstraconAI
Reviewed 2026-09-23 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

Eleven case studies are published and every client is named, splitting into five internal tools, three AI-assisted outbound campaigns and three strategy or roadmap engagements.

The deployment detail is strongest at Singa: an n8n and Gemini pipeline that enriches, scores and routes inbound leads into HubSpot, live in week three, with a Slack channel for flagging errors and prompts tuned weekly—manual lead sorting went from 45 minutes a day to single-digit minutes.

Nordic Healthcare Group's Azure RAG reference search has been in use since August 2025 and S-Group runs a Copilot Studio planning agent, but neither study publishes usage or accuracy numbers, and every build sits on a platform (n8n, Copilot Studio, Azure, Claude) rather than a model OstraconAI trained or hosts.

The weaker fit is buyers who need custom models, data engineering or AI outside marketing and sales—nothing published goes beyond that remit.

### Key strengths
- All 11 case studies name the client, and most quote a named executive with title—Sanoma Media Finland's Chief Commercial Officer, S-Group's Head of Marketing Strategies, Singa's CCO
- The Gosta Labs study publishes its funnel: 3,930 messages, 198 replies and 62 opportunities across three oncology congresses, with the best campaign near a 19% reply rate
- Handover is part of the delivery: Claude Code training at Barona and Claude training at Olo-apteekki so the client team maintains the tools itself

### Good to know
- Several headline numbers are forecasts or quotes—Attendo is 'about to save' 9,000 hours, Sanoma's 'millions of euros' is an estimate—ask which figures were measured after launch
- The hourly rate on this listing sits well above the European range on our rate index, while the site prices by project and monthly retainer—ask how many hours the retainer buys
- Builds run on n8n, Copilot Studio, Azure, Clay, Apollo and Instantly—ask who owns the workflows and accounts, and who monitors them after the engagement ends

## Our take on Siili Solutions
Reviewed 2026-09-07 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

Bobotin is the case to read: a retrieval-augmented agent in production at LähiTapiola Finance that drafts customer-service replies from contract terms and past responses, classifies complaints into regulated categories, works in Finnish, Swedish and English, and always leaves a human to check and send.

It runs on Azure under GDPR and EU AI Act constraints, and Siili maintains it as an ongoing managed service rather than handing it over—the firm holds ISO/IEC 42001 certification for AI management systems and states it was the first listed Finnish company to be granted it.

Around 900 people across 17 offices from Helsinki to Detroit, listed since 2005, with the wider published portfolio running to broader digital delivery—Wärtsilä, Finavia, Elisa, Aalto University—where the AI content varies case by case.

The weaker fit is a buyer who wants a small specialist team; the argument here is governance and scale, which is worth paying for inside a regulated setting and worth questioning outside one.

### Key strengths
- A production AI agent in a regulated financial setting, documented with its architecture, its human checkpoint and the client's IT director on record
- ISO/IEC 42001 certification for AI management systems, explained in practice in the case study rather than displayed as a logo
- Operates the system as an ongoing managed service, so the question of who maintains it after launch has a published answer

### Good to know
- AI depth varies across the wider portfolio—ask which cases are AI delivery and which are digital-platform work
- Around 900 people across 17 offices—ask where your team sits and who leads it
- Bobotin's published results are directional rather than numeric—ask for the throughput figures before and after

## Which to choose
Choose OstraconAI for:
- closer collaboration at a smaller team scale
- disclosed specialization in Healthcare / E-commerce
- broader service offering — also covers AI Marketing

Choose Siili Solutions for:
- a more cost-effective engagement (~400% lower rate)
- larger team capacity for multi-stream or enterprise-scale programs
- disclosed specialization in Public Sector / Manufacturing
- broader service offering — also covers AI Development

## Questions buyers ask

### Which is cheaper, OstraconAI or Siili Solutions?
Siili Solutions is cheaper by roughly 400% — €65/hr median vs €325/hr at OstraconAI. Published rates cover different things at different agencies — seniority mix, discovery and included revisions are the usual variables — so treat the gap as a question to ask, not a verdict.

### Which has more FinTech experience, OstraconAI or Siili Solutions?
Both agencies show documented FinTech work. OstraconAI has the broader industry stack overall, with disclosed experience in Healthcare, E-commerce, SaaS & B2B beyond their shared focus.

### Which scores higher overall, OstraconAI or Siili Solutions?
Siili Solutions scores 68/100, 8 points higher than OstraconAI at 60/100. See our methodology for how scores are calculated.

### Which is faster to engage, OstraconAI or Siili Solutions?
Neither publishes lead times, so this is a read on team size rather than a measured answer. OstraconAI runs the smaller team, which usually means fewer procurement gates and a shorter path to kickoff. Siili Solutions runs a larger one, which tends to mean more steps but more capacity to start parallel workstreams. Current kickoff availability is the number that actually decides it — ask both.

### When should I consider both OstraconAI and Siili Solutions?
Consider running parallel discovery briefs with OstraconAI and Siili Solutions if your project spans multiple workstreams, you want competitive proposals to compare scope and approach, or you're undecided between the specialization angles each brings (see the Best for cards above). Most engagements ultimately go with one — but the parallel-brief phase is a low-cost way to validate fit.

---
Source: AIAgencies.eu — the curated register of European AI agencies. Rate provenance: "agency-confirmed" = disclosed via submission or claimed profile; "directory-listed" = Clutch or two agreeing B2B directories (lone unverified sources are never written). Full method: https://www.aiagencies.eu/methodology · Rate index: https://www.aiagencies.eu/rates