# Hiflylabs vs HolistiCRM

> Two top-rated AI Consulting agencies in Budapest. Side by side: published rates, team size, service and industry coverage, and the curator's assessment of both — pairings are never sold.

Canonical page: https://www.aiagencies.eu/compare/hiflylabs-vs-holisticrm
Generated: 2026-09-17 · Curated by Gabor Kiss · No paid placements — inclusion, score, and rank are never sold.

## Facts
| | Hiflylabs | HolistiCRM |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 61.8/100 | 57.8/100 |
| Hourly rate | not published | €20-40/hr (directory-listed) |
| Team size | 250+ | 2-9 |
| Location | Budapest, Hungary | Budapest, Hungary |
| Founded | 2015 | 2014 |
| Last reviewed | 2026-09-03 | 2026-09-09 |
| Services | AI Consulting, AI Development, AI Automation | AI Automation, AI Consulting, AI Development |
| Industries | FinTech, Manufacturing, Legal | FinTech, E-commerce, SaaS & B2B |

## Our take on Hiflylabs
Reviewed 2026-09-03 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

The named LLM-era work is the reason to read the case studies: Billingo's text-to-SQL and RAG agent went from proof of concept through pilot to full production on OpenAI, Snowflake and OpenSearch with prompt anonymization via MS Presidio, and Erste Bank's agentic RAG knowledge base on LangGraph and Azure AI Search reports 200-plus documents processed and 40% higher answer accuracy.

The older classical work carries the hardest numbers—MOL Group's location-based pricing showed 3.87% gross-margin growth over a control group after six months of business-as-usual operation, and the Arconic root-cause analysis of a decade-old wheel defect ended with the line modified and the defect gone.

Two of the biggest headlines are anonymized (the 99% due-diligence cut at a global investment firm, the 2x fraud-detection accuracy at a European utility) and the Semilab and Adaptive Recognition chatbots are described as proofs of concept, so separate the deployed from the piloted when you ask for references.

The weaker fit is a buyer with a small, self-contained ML task—the studies pair the AI build with data-platform work on Databricks, Azure or Snowflake, and that is the engagement shape the firm is set up for.

### Key strengths
- Stack is listed on every study—LangGraph, MLFlow, Azure AI Search, Databricks Apps, HuggingFace, MS Presidio—so a technical buyer can check the architecture before the first call
- Third-party standing is visible: FT1000 listing, Databricks, Snowflake Select and AWS Select partner tiers, and 50-plus Databricks-certified staff per the homepage
- Named testimonials with names and titles at Catylex, MOL Group, Cirkul, Adaptive Recognition, Semilab and Billingo, and an engineering blog dated from 2020 through August 2026 with named authors

### Good to know
- The 99% analysis-time cut and the 6x ROI belong to anonymized clients—ask for a speakable reference behind each
- The homepage claims 500-plus projects and 200-plus clients against roughly 25 published case studies—ask for the list in your vertical
- Semilab and Adaptive Recognition are named proofs of concept—confirm what has run in production since, and who operates it

## Our take on HolistiCRM
Reviewed 2026-09-09 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

Seven named enterprise engagements, each with the stack and the number attached. Location models for MolGroup picked the retail format for every service station from a few hundred geospatial features. Binary classifiers and a recommender for Delivery Hero's Hungarian brand moved open rates 250 percent and click-throughs 350 percent. Affinity models for Citibank's retail bank improved the booking rate more than sixfold; a response model for a utility improved it 17 percent; OTP Bank has branch-visit prediction and Rossmann daily sales prediction. The stack is the same throughout: Azure Machine Learning, Data Factory and Power BI.

The thing to establish before anything else is who delivered it. The engagements are bank and retail scale, the team is under ten people, and the company LinkedIn link resolves to a personal profile.

Everything sits on one references page with no dates and no individual write-ups, so the sequence and the recency are not visible.

HolistiCRM publishes no rate itself; the €20–40/h shown here comes from a third-party directory listing, and it is far below the European range on our rate index for work of this kind.

### Key strengths
- Seven named enterprise clients with a measured result on each—open rate, click-through, booking rate, prediction accuracy—rather than capability claims
- The stack is stated consistently across engagements: Azure Machine Learning, Azure Data Factory and Power BI, with automated retraining described
- The problems are commercially specific: retail format selection from geospatial features, branch-visit prediction, next-best-offer, churn-based retention

### Good to know
- Bank and retail-scale engagements against a team under ten and a company link that resolves to a personal profile—ask which were delivered by this firm and which by its founder elsewhere
- All seven sit on one references page with no dates and no individual studies; ask when each ran and what is still in production
- The directory rate sits far below the European range on our rate index for enterprise model work—ask who does the delivery and where

## Which to choose
Choose Hiflylabs for:
- larger team capacity for multi-stream or enterprise-scale programs
- disclosed specialization in Manufacturing / Legal
- a higher overall editorial score

Choose HolistiCRM for:
- closer collaboration at a smaller team scale
- disclosed specialization in E-commerce / SaaS & B2B

## Questions buyers ask

### Which has more FinTech experience, Hiflylabs or HolistiCRM?
Both agencies show documented FinTech work and have similar industry breadth. Compare directly on the agency profiles: Hiflylabs and HolistiCRM.

### Which scores higher overall, Hiflylabs or HolistiCRM?
Hiflylabs scores 61.8/100, 4 points higher than HolistiCRM at 57.8/100. Both portfolio quality and business credibility feed into the score — see our methodology for the full breakdown.

### Which is faster to engage, Hiflylabs or HolistiCRM?
Neither publishes lead times, so this is a read on team size rather than a measured answer. HolistiCRM runs the smaller team, which usually means fewer procurement gates and a shorter path to kickoff. Hiflylabs runs a larger one, which tends to mean more steps but more capacity to start parallel workstreams. Current kickoff availability is the number that actually decides it — ask both.

### When should I consider both Hiflylabs and HolistiCRM?
Consider running parallel discovery briefs with Hiflylabs and HolistiCRM if your project spans multiple workstreams, you want competitive proposals to compare scope and approach, or you're undecided between the specialization angles each brings (see the Best for cards above). Most engagements ultimately go with one — but the parallel-brief phase is a low-cost way to validate fit.

---
Source: AIAgencies.eu — the curated register of European AI agencies. Rate provenance: "agency-confirmed" = disclosed via submission or claimed profile; "directory-listed" = Clutch or two agreeing B2B directories (lone unverified sources are never written). Full method: https://www.aiagencies.eu/methodology · Rate index: https://www.aiagencies.eu/rates