# DevXHub vs Siili Solutions

> Two top-rated AI Development agencies in Helsinki. Side by side: published rates, team size, service and industry coverage, and the curator's assessment of both — pairings are never sold.

Canonical page: https://www.aiagencies.eu/compare/devxhub-vs-siili-solutions
Generated: 2026-09-17 · Curated by Gabor Kiss · No paid placements — inclusion, score, and rank are never sold.

## Facts
| | DevXHub | Siili Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 42/100 | 68/100 |
| Hourly rate | €20-40/hr (directory-listed) | €45-85/hr (directory-listed) |
| Team size | 50-249 | 250+ |
| Location | Helsinki, Finland | Helsinki, Finland |
| Founded | 2020 | 2005 |
| Last reviewed | 2026-09-10 | 2026-09-07 |
| Services | AI Development, AI Agents, AI Consulting | AI Consulting, AI Development, AI Automation |
| Industries | SaaS & B2B, E-commerce, FinTech | FinTech, Public Sector, Manufacturing |

## Our take on DevXHub
Reviewed 2026-09-10 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

The AI entries in the portfolio are builds for AI companies rather than AI built into a business: an all-in-one tools hub delivered in three months as design, backend and integration work, and a conversational platform in the same shape.

No case study publishes a model choice, an evaluation or a result, so what is demonstrated is the ability to ship a product around someone else's models.

Read the geography before shortlisting: the Helsinki presence is an office, and the company's own site puts its main base in Bangladesh with a further US location.

Best for founders who need capable full-stack delivery at a low rate and already know what they want built, not for buyers who need the supplier to bring the machine-learning judgment.

### Key strengths
- A large published case library across e-commerce, analytics, ERP and internal tooling, so general delivery capability is easy to assess
- Stated team of 55-plus with offices on three continents, which supports timezone coverage and staff augmentation arrangements

### Good to know
- No AI case study names a model, an evaluation method or an outcome—ask what was engineered versus integrated, and who made the model decisions
- The Helsinki listing is an office and delivery is based elsewhere; confirm where your team sits, which entity contracts and how your data is handled
- DevXHub publishes no rate itself; the €20-40/h shown here comes from a third-party directory listing and reflects an offshore delivery model

## Our take on Siili Solutions
Reviewed 2026-09-07 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

Bobotin is the case to read: a retrieval-augmented agent in production at LähiTapiola Finance that drafts customer-service replies from contract terms and past responses, classifies complaints into regulated categories, works in Finnish, Swedish and English, and always leaves a human to check and send.

It runs on Azure under GDPR and EU AI Act constraints, and Siili maintains it as an ongoing managed service rather than handing it over—the firm holds ISO/IEC 42001 certification for AI management systems and states it was the first listed Finnish company to be granted it.

Around 900 people across 17 offices from Helsinki to Detroit, listed since 2005, with the wider published portfolio running to broader digital delivery—Wärtsilä, Finavia, Elisa, Aalto University—where the AI content varies case by case.

The weaker fit is a buyer who wants a small specialist team; the argument here is governance and scale, which is worth paying for inside a regulated setting and worth questioning outside one.

### Key strengths
- A production AI agent in a regulated financial setting, documented with its architecture, its human checkpoint and the client's IT director on record
- ISO/IEC 42001 certification for AI management systems, explained in practice in the case study rather than displayed as a logo
- Operates the system as an ongoing managed service, so the question of who maintains it after launch has a published answer

### Good to know
- AI depth varies across the wider portfolio—ask which cases are AI delivery and which are digital-platform work
- Around 900 people across 17 offices—ask where your team sits and who leads it
- Bobotin's published results are directional rather than numeric—ask for the throughput figures before and after

## Which to choose
Choose DevXHub for:
- a more cost-effective engagement (~54% lower rate)
- closer collaboration at a smaller team scale
- disclosed specialization in SaaS & B2B / E-commerce
- broader service offering — also covers AI Agents

Choose Siili Solutions for:
- larger team capacity for multi-stream or enterprise-scale programs
- disclosed specialization in Public Sector / Manufacturing
- broader service offering — also covers AI Automation
- a higher overall editorial score

## Questions buyers ask

### Which is cheaper, DevXHub or Siili Solutions?
DevXHub is cheaper by roughly 54% — €30/hr median vs €65/hr at Siili Solutions. Published rates cover different things at different agencies — seniority mix, discovery and included revisions are the usual variables — so treat the gap as a question to ask, not a verdict.

### Which has more FinTech experience, DevXHub or Siili Solutions?
Both agencies show documented FinTech work and have similar industry breadth. Compare directly on the agency profiles: DevXHub and Siili Solutions.

### Which scores higher overall, DevXHub or Siili Solutions?
Siili Solutions scores 68/100, 26 points higher than DevXHub at 42/100. See our methodology for how scores are calculated.

### When should I consider both DevXHub and Siili Solutions?
Consider running parallel discovery briefs with DevXHub and Siili Solutions if your project spans multiple workstreams, you want competitive proposals to compare scope and approach, or you're undecided between the specialization angles each brings (see the Best for cards above). Most engagements ultimately go with one — but the parallel-brief phase is a low-cost way to validate fit.

---
Source: AIAgencies.eu — the curated register of European AI agencies. Rate provenance: "agency-confirmed" = disclosed via submission or claimed profile; "directory-listed" = Clutch or two agreeing B2B directories (lone unverified sources are never written). Full method: https://www.aiagencies.eu/methodology · Rate index: https://www.aiagencies.eu/rates