# DEPT vs Rewire

> Two top-rated AI Development agencies in Amsterdam. Side by side: published rates, team size, service and industry coverage, and the curator's assessment of both — pairings are never sold.

Canonical page: https://www.aiagencies.eu/compare/dept-vs-rewire
Generated: 2026-09-20 · Curated by Gabor Kiss · No paid placements — inclusion, score, and rank are never sold.

## Facts
| | DEPT | Rewire |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 64/100 | 68/100 |
| Hourly rate | €130-170/hr (directory-listed) | €260/hr |
| Team size | 1000-9999 | 50-249 |
| Location | Amsterdam, Netherlands | Amsterdam, Netherlands |
| Founded | 2016 | 2006 |
| Last reviewed | 2026-08-06 | 2026-08-04 |
| Services | AI Development, AI Marketing, Generative AI | AI Consulting, AI Development, Generative AI |
| Industries | SaaS & B2B | FinTech, Healthcare, E-commerce |

## Our take on DEPT
Reviewed 2026-08-06 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

Signs is the most visible AI work here: a sign-language learning platform using computer vision to check the learner's signing, which reached more than 20 million people in its first week and recorded 20,000 signs learned in ten days. It is a collaboration with NVIDIA and the American Society for Deaf Children rather than a commissioned client project, which is worth knowing when you read it as evidence.

The commissioned AI work is more ordinary and more useful as a guide: a return-value prediction model for the fashion retailer Omoda that fed its marketing hub, Clair for CaryHealth, a reference app its own case study credits with 90% faster clinical search, and nine CGI avatars generated for Inter's INTERISTA fan platform, published as 13.5 times faster and 92% cheaper than the comparable manual workflow.

Size is the real variable: DEPT operates across many markets, so who staffs your project matters more here than at a twenty-person firm.

The weaker fit is an enterprise wanting a production AI system governed and operated long-term; this bench is strongest where AI meets the audience.

### Key strengths
- Named clients with figures attached across three sectors: retail returns, clinical search, sports fan engagement
- Computer vision applied to genuinely hard interaction problems, not generative demos
- International delivery capacity, so multi-market rollouts do not need a second agency

### Good to know
- Signs is collaborative work with NVIDIA, not a client engagement—judge the commissioned cases separately
- Published AI work is weighted toward audience-facing products—ask for an operated system with an SLA if that is what you need
- At this scale, insist on knowing the named team, not the agency's aggregate credentials

## Our take on Rewire
Reviewed 2026-08-04 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

The impact studies are the most consistently quantified set in the register: Eneco's personalized engagement platform delivering recommendations to two million households automatically, a pricing engagement reporting an 11% profit increase, and clinical-trial site selection that widened the eligible patient pool by 40% and picked fifteen sites contributing a quarter of the enrollment target.

Named clients run to bol.com, ABN AMRO, Rabobank, Eneco, Heineken, KPN and NS, though the deeper studies are often anonymized by sector rather than named.

Rewire also runs a training academy for client data teams, which is a different business from delivery and worth pricing separately.

The weaker fit is a team wanting a single system built and handed over; the shape of this practice is a program, with capability transfer attached.

### Key strengths
- Publishes outcome numbers on most engagements, including profit and forecast-accuracy figures rather than adoption metrics
- The Eneco platform is running unattended at two-million-household scale, which is a rare thing to be able to check
- In-house academy means the capability can stay with your team rather than leaving with the consultants

### Good to know
- The most detailed studies anonymize the client by sector—ask for a reference in yours before committing
- Rewire publishes no rate itself; the €260/h figure shown here comes from a third-party directory listing—expect program-scale pricing

## Which to choose
Choose DEPT for:
- a more cost-effective engagement (~42% lower rate)
- larger team capacity for multi-stream or enterprise-scale programs
- disclosed specialization in SaaS & B2B
- broader service offering — also covers AI Marketing

Choose Rewire for:
- closer collaboration at a smaller team scale
- disclosed specialization in FinTech / Healthcare
- broader service offering — also covers AI Consulting
- a higher overall editorial score

## Questions buyers ask

### Which is cheaper, DEPT or Rewire?
DEPT is cheaper by roughly 42% — €150/hr median vs €260/hr at Rewire. Published rates cover different things at different agencies — seniority mix, discovery and included revisions are the usual variables — so treat the gap as a question to ask, not a verdict.

### Which scores higher overall, DEPT or Rewire?
Rewire scores 68/100, 4 points higher than DEPT at 64/100. See our methodology for how scores are calculated.

### When should I consider both DEPT and Rewire?
Consider running parallel discovery briefs with DEPT and Rewire if your project spans multiple workstreams, you want competitive proposals to compare scope and approach, or you're undecided between the specialization angles each brings (see the Best for cards above). Most engagements ultimately go with one — but the parallel-brief phase is a low-cost way to validate fit.

---
Source: AIAgencies.eu — the curated register of European AI agencies. Rate provenance: "agency-confirmed" = disclosed via submission or claimed profile; "directory-listed" = Clutch or two agreeing B2B directories (lone unverified sources are never written). Full method: https://www.aiagencies.eu/methodology · Rate index: https://www.aiagencies.eu/rates