# Blueberry Consultants vs Wolf Logic

> Two top-rated AI Development agencies in Birmingham. Side by side: published rates, team size, service and industry coverage, and the curator's assessment of both — pairings are never sold.

Canonical page: https://www.aiagencies.eu/compare/blueberry-consultants-vs-wolf-logic
Generated: 2026-09-17 · Curated by Gabor Kiss · No paid placements — inclusion, score, and rank are never sold.

## Facts
| | Blueberry Consultants | Wolf Logic |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 55/100 | 51/100 |
| Hourly rate | €20-40/hr (directory-listed) | €45-85/hr (directory-listed) |
| Team size | 10-49 | 2-9 |
| Location | Birmingham, United Kingdom | Birmingham, United Kingdom |
| Founded | 1996 | 2018 |
| Last reviewed | 2026-09-04 | 2026-09-10 |
| Services | AI Development, Generative AI, AI Consulting | AI Development, AI Consulting, AI Agents |
| Industries | Healthcare, SaaS & B2B | Healthcare, Manufacturing, Public Sector |

## Our take on Blueberry Consultants
Reviewed 2026-09-04 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

The strongest evidence is not a case study but the published engineering: multi-LLM comparisons run on named hardware with token-throughput figures, speech-to-text accuracy tests, RAG document Q&A demos and a write-up on indirect prompt injection—reproducible technical work rather than the listicles this category usually publishes.

The one deployed model in the portfolio is an on-device YOLO system in a low-cost laryngoscope that flags throat abnormalities in real time, described as rescued from a failed build and taken to a commercial-grade application, though the client is not named.

The three named case studies—Dimec's pharmacy app, an NHS A&E patient-monitoring whiteboard and a workflow system for PKF Cooper Parry—predate the AI positioning and describe conventional software delivery.

The weaker fit is a buyer who wants a named-client AI reference to check: the AI work is visible as demos, tooling and one anonymized deployment, not as a portfolio.

### Key strengths
- €20–40/h from a company trading since 1996 that publishes the technical basis for its model recommendations
- In-house tooling ships rather than sits on a roadmap—an AI survey extension, a prompt assistant and an application framework, alongside a multi-model routing layer
- Named service lines address getting an AI-generated prototype to production, including code hardening and security review, which is where most vibe-coded builds fail

### Good to know
- The medical device deployment is anonymized—ask for a speakable reference behind the on-device model work before shortlisting on it
- The client-named case studies are pre-LLM software projects; ask for a delivered generative-AI engagement with dates and a contact
- No ML engineers or researchers are named on the site—confirm who builds the model layer versus who integrates it

## Our take on Wolf Logic
Reviewed 2026-09-10 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

The named-client record is software rather than AI: Nidec's 1990s motor-drive control platform rebuilt onto an API tier, and Health Navigator's NHS-facing platform modernized to GDPR and OWASP standards without interrupting patient care.

The AI work is published one layer back—a UK-hosted clinical risk pipeline that surfaces hazards for a clinician to approve, and Wolfpack, the firm's own agent platform—but those pages name sectors, not clients.

So the delivery track record is checkable and the AI track record is not yet.

Wolf Logic publishes a fixed-fee two-week review rather than an hourly price; the €45-85/h shown here comes from a third-party directory listing.

Best for regulated UK buyers modernizing a system that has to keep running, who want AI added under human sign-off rather than a greenfield build.

### Key strengths
- More than twenty case studies name the client, which makes reference checks straightforward in a category where most work is anonymized
- Data residency and oversight are designed in on the health work: a UK-hosted model pipeline with sanitized data review and clinician approval before anything is acted on
- A fixed-fee two-week review gives a costed entry point, with the opinion refundable if it is not useful

### Good to know
- No AI case study names a client yet—ask which agent projects are live, who operates them and what they cost to run
- Wolfpack is the firm's own platform; clarify what you own, what is licensed and what happens to your agents if you stop paying
- The team is 2-9 people, the about page did not resolve at review time and the company link is a personal LinkedIn—ask who is assigned and what support looks like after handover

## Which to choose
Choose Blueberry Consultants for:
- a more cost-effective engagement (~54% lower rate)
- larger team capacity for multi-stream or enterprise-scale programs
- disclosed specialization in SaaS & B2B
- broader service offering — also covers Generative AI

Choose Wolf Logic for:
- closer collaboration at a smaller team scale
- disclosed specialization in Manufacturing / Public Sector
- broader service offering — also covers AI Agents

## Questions buyers ask

### Which is cheaper, Blueberry Consultants or Wolf Logic?
Blueberry Consultants is cheaper by roughly 54% — €30/hr median vs €65/hr at Wolf Logic. Published rates cover different things at different agencies — seniority mix, discovery and included revisions are the usual variables — so treat the gap as a question to ask, not a verdict.

### Which has more Healthcare experience, Blueberry Consultants or Wolf Logic?
Both agencies show documented Healthcare work. Wolf Logic has the broader industry stack overall, with disclosed experience in Manufacturing, Public Sector beyond their shared focus.

### Which scores higher overall, Blueberry Consultants or Wolf Logic?
Blueberry Consultants scores 55/100, 4 points higher than Wolf Logic at 51/100. Both portfolio quality and business credibility feed into the score — see our methodology for the full breakdown.

### When should I consider both Blueberry Consultants and Wolf Logic?
Consider running parallel discovery briefs with Blueberry Consultants and Wolf Logic if your project spans multiple workstreams, you want competitive proposals to compare scope and approach, or you're undecided between the specialization angles each brings (see the Best for cards above). Most engagements ultimately go with one — but the parallel-brief phase is a low-cost way to validate fit.

---
Source: AIAgencies.eu — the curated register of European AI agencies. Rate provenance: "agency-confirmed" = disclosed via submission or claimed profile; "directory-listed" = Clutch or two agreeing B2B directories (lone unverified sources are never written). Full method: https://www.aiagencies.eu/methodology · Rate index: https://www.aiagencies.eu/rates