# appliedAI vs elunic

> Two top-rated AI Consulting agencies in Munich. Side by side: published rates, team size, service and industry coverage, and the curator's assessment of both — pairings are never sold.

Canonical page: https://www.aiagencies.eu/compare/appliedai-vs-elunic
Generated: 2026-09-20 · Curated by Gabor Kiss · No paid placements — inclusion, score, and rank are never sold.

## Facts
| | appliedAI | elunic |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 64.3/100 | 61.8/100 |
| Hourly rate | not published | not published |
| Team size | — | 10-49 |
| Location | Munich, Germany | Munich, Germany |
| Founded | — | 2013 |
| Last reviewed | 2026-08-04 | 2026-09-20 |
| Services | AI Consulting, AI Development, AI Agents, Generative AI | AI Development, AI Consulting, AI Agents |
| Industries | Manufacturing, Healthcare | Manufacturing, Healthcare |

## Our take on appliedAI
Reviewed 2026-08-04 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

The Maschinenfabrik Reinhausen build is the one to read: a large language model on a skills-based architecture over a RAG knowledge base, in production, publishing roughly 45x faster Q&A, 1500x on automated extraction and 90% accuracy on base-analysis extraction.

The published client list runs to Roche, Linde, Nokia, Vonovia and Giesecke+Devrient, and the G+D write-up tracks a named enterprise from "experimenting" to "practising" over two years rather than claiming a single win.

Much of the reference library is use-case pages—defect detection, dynamic pricing, anomaly detection—that describe capability rather than a named engagement, so the depth is uneven across it.

The weaker fit is a small team wanting a quick build: the offering is shaped around enterprise programs, maturity assessment and EU AI Act governance.

### Key strengths
- One of the few listed agencies publishing hard speedup and accuracy figures from a production system
- AI Act and governance work is a stated practice line, not a blog topic
- An agent program with a published three-month path to a production-ready agent

### Good to know
- Several reference pages describe use cases rather than named client engagements—ask which are live deployments
- No published rates, headcount or founding year; budget for enterprise procurement

## Our take on elunic
Reviewed 2026-09-20 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

Four named AI installations are documented on live production lines: thyssenkrupp Automotive Body Solutions inspecting car-body doors inline, DB Cargo screening images of up to 400 freight wagons a day for slipped transport film as a camera retrofit over a cloud interface, voestalpine Automotive Components Schwäbisch Gmünd running 360-degree inspection cells on the press-shop outfeed conveyor, and Murrelektronik's "Murrlin" assistant answering technical questions over more than 95,000 product articles on elunic's eluna Multi Agent platform.

What none of the write-ups carry is an outcome figure—no reject rate before and after, no inspection hours saved, no payback measured—so the published evidence shows that the systems were installed and accepted, not what they returned; the 99 percent sensitivity quoted in the thyssenkrupp study is the software's stated guarantee, not a result measured on that line.

Two live showcase pages also carry defects worth noticing: the voestalpine study still prints a Lorem ipsum placeholder quote under the name Max Mustermann, and the Jentner study closes with a testimonial from Schunk's innovation director about a different project.

The weaker fit is a buyer who wants one name on one contract—the impressum states that operations are carried out by the subsidiary elunic Systems GmbH, the inspection product carries an AI.SEE GmbH copyright, and the voestalpine study says voestalpine commissioned elunic AG, so settle which entity signs and which one supports the system.

### Key strengths
- Client-side names are on the record: Manuel Gentner at thyssenkrupp, Achim Leister at DB Cargo and CDO Fabian Distel at Murrelektronik are quoted by name and title, so references are traceable
- AI.SEE goes into a line both ways—inline at thyssenkrupp and voestalpine, camera retrofit over a cloud interface at DB Cargo—so an existing conveyor does not have to be rebuilt to start
- eluna Multi Agent, the platform behind the Murrelektronik assistant, is published as open source and offered from SaaS to on-premises, which limits how much of a deployment is tied to one vendor

### Good to know
- No case study publishes a before-and-after number—ask each reference what the reject rate, the inspection time or the payback period actually did after go-live
- Confirm which entity signs and which supports: the impressum assigns operations to elunic Systems GmbH, while the voestalpine study says voestalpine commissioned elunic AG
- The GROB FactoryChat and FactoryDashboard study still reads "currently in beta phase" and dates to 2021—ask what happened to it before counting it as delivered work

## Which to choose
Choose appliedAI for:
- closer collaboration at a smaller team scale
- broader service offering — also covers Generative AI
- a higher overall editorial score

Choose elunic for:
- larger team capacity for multi-stream or enterprise-scale programs
- an overall editorial score of 61.8/100

## Questions buyers ask

### Which has more Manufacturing experience, appliedAI or elunic?
Both agencies show documented Manufacturing work and have similar industry breadth. Compare directly on the agency profiles: appliedAI and elunic.

### Which scores higher overall, appliedAI or elunic?
appliedAI scores 64.3/100, 2.5 points higher than elunic at 61.8/100. Both portfolio quality and business credibility feed into the score — see our methodology for the full breakdown.

### When should I consider both appliedAI and elunic?
Consider running parallel discovery briefs with appliedAI and elunic if your project spans multiple workstreams, you want competitive proposals to compare scope and approach, or you're undecided between the specialization angles each brings (see the Best for cards above). Most engagements ultimately go with one — but the parallel-brief phase is a low-cost way to validate fit.

---
Source: AIAgencies.eu — the curated register of European AI agencies. Rate provenance: "agency-confirmed" = disclosed via submission or claimed profile; "directory-listed" = Clutch or two agreeing B2B directories (lone unverified sources are never written). Full method: https://www.aiagencies.eu/methodology · Rate index: https://www.aiagencies.eu/rates