# Apertia Tech vs Geneea

> Two top-rated AI Automation agencies in Prague. Side by side: published rates, team size, service and industry coverage, and the curator's assessment of both — pairings are never sold.

Canonical page: https://www.aiagencies.eu/compare/apertia-tech-vs-geneea
Generated: 2026-09-17 · Curated by Gabor Kiss · No paid placements — inclusion, score, and rank are never sold.

## Facts
| | Apertia Tech | Geneea |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 48.8/100 | 61.8/100 |
| Hourly rate | not published | not published |
| Team size | 10-49 | 10-49 |
| Location | Prague, Czech Republic | Prague, Czech Republic |
| Founded | 2019 | 2014 |
| Last reviewed | 2026-09-09 | 2026-09-03 |
| Services | AI Agents, AI Automation, AI Development | AI Development, AI Automation, AI Consulting |
| Industries | Manufacturing, E-commerce, SaaS & B2B | SaaS & B2B, E-commerce, FinTech |

## Our take on Apertia Tech
Reviewed 2026-09-09 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

Twenty-three case studies, three of them AI flagships with hard numbers: a wholesaler's purchasing and inventory system with demand prediction at a stated 30 percent cost reduction, a voice agent wired into a CRM resolving 90 percent of inquiries without an operator at a three-second average response, and invoice extraction at 98 percent accuracy and five seconds a document against five minutes by hand.

Every one of those clients is anonymized by sector—a wholesale company, a finance department, customer support—while the named clients on the site carry no engagement description. The page says outright that hard return figures for the unnumbered studies are available on request under a non-disclosure agreement, which is at least a stated policy rather than a silence.

The rest of the portfolio is the business it grew out of: ten enterprise resource planning implementations and four CRM builds, the AI sitting on top of systems the same team installed.

The weaker fit is a buyer outside the Czech market or one who needs to speak to the reference before signing, since the site is Czech only and the numbered work is unattributed.

### Key strengths
- Three AI engagements publish hard numbers: 30 percent purchasing cost reduction, 90 percent of support inquiries resolved without an operator, 98 percent invoice extraction accuracy
- The AI sits on enterprise resource planning and CRM systems the same team implements, so the integration question is answered before it is asked
- The site states its disclosure policy—return figures for the unnumbered studies available under a non-disclosure agreement—rather than leaving the gap unexplained

### Good to know
- All three numbered flagships are anonymized by sector—ask for a reference you can call, since the numbers are the reason to shortlist
- TRIDO, Dr. Max and the other named clients carry no described engagement; ask which of them runs an AI system rather than an ERP
- The site is published in Czech only—confirm working language and support hours before a cross-border engagement

## Our take on Geneea
Reviewed 2026-09-03 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

Geneea's published case studies show NLP running in production, not pilots: a personalization engine built with Recombee lifted Economia's conversion rate 64% and later expanded to the centrum.cz portal at over 50 million recommendation requests a month, and Heureka's daily-updated review summaries score 91% helpful across more than 2.8 million reviews.

The ČTK election-night generator has covered five Czech election cycles since 2020 at up to one article a second and now also writes recurring weekly fuel-price and monthly accident reports, evidence the system stayed in use well past its first deployment.

Stack detail stops at the product layer—Geneea names its own NLP engine, aspect-based sentiment analysis and, in newer offerings, RAG and LLMs, but not specific model providers or infrastructure, so ask for that detail directly if it matters to your evaluation.

The weaker fit is buyers outside media, banking and e-commerce who need a narrow single-language project—every documented client here runs a high-volume, multi-market content or feedback operation.

### Key strengths
- Official technology-partner status with Stibo DX since 2025 puts Geneea's semantic tagging and RAG research assistant inside a live enterprise publishing platform (CUE), not a standalone tool.
- Hello bank!, a BNP Paribas digital bank serving 350,000 clients, credits the deployment with faster daily feedback triage and names its internal owner on record.
- Co-founders present original work at industry venues (WAN-IFRA AI Forum, FIBEP Tech Day) rather than marketing content alone.

### Good to know
- Ask for the specific model or provider behind the 'RAG' and 'LLM' claims in newer products—published case studies name techniques, not model vendors or infrastructure.
- Radio France's location-mapping project grew out of a four-month 'Sandbox' program—confirm it is still running before citing it as an ongoing deployment.
- No published rates are visible on site—ask Geneea to benchmark against the European range on our rate index.

## Which to choose
Choose Apertia Tech for:
- disclosed specialization in Manufacturing
- broader service offering — also covers AI Agents

Choose Geneea for:
- disclosed specialization in FinTech
- broader service offering — also covers AI Consulting
- a higher overall editorial score

## Questions buyers ask

### Which has more E-commerce experience, Apertia Tech or Geneea?
Both agencies show documented E-commerce work and have similar industry breadth. Compare directly on the agency profiles: Apertia Tech and Geneea.

### Which scores higher overall, Apertia Tech or Geneea?
Geneea scores 61.8/100, 13 points higher than Apertia Tech at 48.8/100. See our methodology for how scores are calculated.

### When should I consider both Apertia Tech and Geneea?
Consider running parallel discovery briefs with Apertia Tech and Geneea if your project spans multiple workstreams, you want competitive proposals to compare scope and approach, or you're undecided between the specialization angles each brings (see the Best for cards above). Most engagements ultimately go with one — but the parallel-brief phase is a low-cost way to validate fit.

---
Source: AIAgencies.eu — the curated register of European AI agencies. Rate provenance: "agency-confirmed" = disclosed via submission or claimed profile; "directory-listed" = Clutch or two agreeing B2B directories (lone unverified sources are never written). Full method: https://www.aiagencies.eu/methodology · Rate index: https://www.aiagencies.eu/rates