# Alpdev vs Indigo Labs

> Two top-rated AI Development agencies in Ljubljana. Side by side: published rates, team size, service and industry coverage, and the curator's assessment of both — pairings are never sold.

Canonical page: https://www.aiagencies.eu/compare/alpdev-vs-indigo-labs
Generated: 2026-09-17 · Curated by Gabor Kiss · No paid placements — inclusion, score, and rank are never sold.

## Facts
| | Alpdev | Indigo Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 51/100 | 60/100 |
| Hourly rate | €45-85/hr (directory-listed) | €45-85/hr (directory-listed) |
| Team size | 2-9 | 10-49 |
| Location | Ljubljana, Slovenia | Ljubljana, Slovenia |
| Founded | 2025 | 2021 |
| Last reviewed | 2026-09-07 | 2026-09-07 |
| Services | AI Development, AI Automation, AI Agents | AI Development, AI Automation, AI Agents |
| Industries | SaaS & B2B, E-commerce, FinTech | Manufacturing, SaaS & B2B, E-commerce |

## Our take on Alpdev
Reviewed 2026-09-07 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

Nine client references, every one named and every one describing what was actually built: for Polfin, a three-score lead model whose intent score is language-model derived, with a separate cooling layer for churn risk, and a second engagement putting a real-time assistant with live transcription into the sales team's calls alongside CRM and telephony.

Bent's assistant is described as deterministic on purpose—it recommends cleaning products by linking to real catalog entries through the ERP rather than generating an answer—which is the right design decision stated out loud.

The firm was founded in 2025 with fewer than ten people, so the depth sits in the founder's published background, a Delft computer-science degree with a thesis on language-model performance, rather than in a delivery history—and no reference carries an outcome number.

The weaker fit is a buyer who needs proof a system held up over years; at €45–85/h with an OpenAI partnership and this much published detail, the trade is specificity now against track record later.

### Key strengths
- Nine named clients, with each reference stating the architecture rather than the benefit: scoring layers, telephony integration, ERP-linked retrieval
- Design decisions are defended, including a deterministic recommender chosen over a generative one
- The founder's technical background is published and checkable, and the firm is an OpenAI Select Partner

### Good to know
- No reference carries a measured outcome—ask each named client what changed after launch
- Founded in 2025 with fewer than ten people—ask what happens to support and maintenance as the client list grows
- Several references are recent builds—ask which systems have been running longest and what broke

## Our take on Indigo Labs
Reviewed 2026-09-07 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

The project pages publish what most agencies withhold: duration, team size, budget band, the full stack and a client quote. The multilingual chatbot for the University of Ljubljana's mechanical engineering faculty ran two months with one engineer at a €5k–10k budget; the RISO ESG tool pairs Azure AI Document Intelligence with OpenAI to pre-fill compliance templates from documents the client uploads.

RISO reports a 70% reduction in the time to run a double-materiality analysis, with that platform described as an MVP in testing rather than a finished product, and the padel-court system processes four camera feeds in real time on NVIDIA Jetson hardware.

Eight named clients across agritech, sports, enterprise asset management and ESG compliance, at €45–85/h from a Ljubljana team of 10-49.

The weaker fit is a buyer who needs an established vendor with a decade of production systems behind it; what is on offer here is scoping transparency and small, bounded builds.

### Key strengths
- Every project page states duration, team size, budget band and the full stack, which makes scoping a conversation rather than a negotiation
- Client testimonials carry outcomes, including a 70% reduction in the time to run a double-materiality analysis on the ESG tool
- Range spans language models and classical machine vision: Azure AI Document Intelligence with OpenAI on one build, four-camera real-time inference on NVIDIA Jetson on another

### Good to know
- Several flagship builds are described as MVPs in testing—ask which are live with real users today
- Published team sizes run one to three people per project—confirm capacity if you need parallel workstreams
- Budgets appear as per-project bands rather than a rate card—confirm the hourly basis and what maintenance costs after launch

## Which to choose
Choose Alpdev for:
- closer collaboration at a smaller team scale
- disclosed specialization in FinTech

Choose Indigo Labs for:
- larger team capacity for multi-stream or enterprise-scale programs
- disclosed specialization in Manufacturing
- a higher overall editorial score

## Questions buyers ask

### Which is cheaper, Alpdev or Indigo Labs?
Pricing is comparable: Alpdev at €65/hr median vs Indigo Labs at €65/hr. Choose on specialization rather than cost.

### Which has more SaaS & B2B experience, Alpdev or Indigo Labs?
Both agencies show documented SaaS & B2B work and have similar industry breadth. Compare directly on the agency profiles: Alpdev and Indigo Labs.

### Which scores higher overall, Alpdev or Indigo Labs?
Indigo Labs scores 60/100, 9 points higher than Alpdev at 51/100. See our methodology for how scores are calculated.

### When should I consider both Alpdev and Indigo Labs?
Consider running parallel discovery briefs with Alpdev and Indigo Labs if your project spans multiple workstreams, you want competitive proposals to compare scope and approach, or you're undecided between the specialization angles each brings (see the Best for cards above). Most engagements ultimately go with one — but the parallel-brief phase is a low-cost way to validate fit.

---
Source: AIAgencies.eu — the curated register of European AI agencies. Rate provenance: "agency-confirmed" = disclosed via submission or claimed profile; "directory-listed" = Clutch or two agreeing B2B directories (lone unverified sources are never written). Full method: https://www.aiagencies.eu/methodology · Rate index: https://www.aiagencies.eu/rates