# AI Pirates vs peoly

> Comparing AI Video options: Munich vs Prague. Side by side: published rates, team size, service and industry coverage, and the curator's assessment of both — pairings are never sold.

Canonical page: https://www.aiagencies.eu/compare/ai-pirates-vs-peoly
Generated: 2026-10-01 · Curated by Gabor Kiss · No paid placements — inclusion, score, and rank are never sold.

## Facts
| | AI Pirates | peoly |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 47.3/100 | 48.8/100 |
| Hourly rate | not published | not published |
| Team size | — | 10-49 |
| Location | Munich, Germany | Prague, Czech Republic |
| Founded | — | 2019 |
| Last reviewed | 2026-08-04 | 2026-09-20 |
| Services | AI Consulting, AI Agents, AI Video | AI Development, AI Automation, AI Video |
| Industries | E-commerce | Manufacturing, SaaS & B2B, E-commerce |

## Our take on AI Pirates
Reviewed 2026-08-04 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

Seven named clients each get their own published case, which is more transparency than most studios this size offer, and CineCockpit is a real end-to-end build: a six-agent content intelligence platform over 30,000 films from 15 EU markets, hosted in Germany and live at its own domain.

The rest of the published work is lighter than that headline suggests—an 18-month roadmap with 23 prioritized use cases for Fuxtec, AI trailer workflows and tool enablement for LEONINE, GPT training for Constantin Entertainment.

No case study names a model, framework or infrastructure component, and CineCockpit was described as pre-launch at the time of review.

Best for media, entertainment and consumer brands wanting AI capability brought into a team, with a studio that will also build the product if the workshop turns into one.

### Key strengths
- Published price anchors are unusually concrete: audits from around €1,500, production systems €20,000-80,000
- CineCockpit is verifiable independently—the platform is live and sells at €49/month
- Every named client has a dedicated case page rather than a logo on a wall

### Good to know
- No case study names the models or stack—ask what CineCockpit is actually built on before commissioning similar work
- Workshops and roadmaps dominate the portfolio; ask for a system they built and still operate

## Our take on peoly
Reviewed 2026-09-20 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

Twelve case-study summaries sit on the homepage and not one names the client: convolutional networks paired with custom illumination catching paint defects under 0.1 mm at over 95 percent accuracy for an automotive manufacturer, a sound model diagnosing car faults at 98 percent accuracy, a visual-search microservice for a furniture platform.

The productized side is more current and easier to check—five edge applications covering PPE detection, QR and barcode reading, shopping-cart tracking, occupancy monitoring and sound analysis ship as ACAP apps running on Axis ARTPEC-8 and 9 camera chips, behind NVIDIA Metropolis membership since 2022 and Axis Technology Integration Partner status since April 2024.

The AI capability arrived by acquisition: peoly bought GoodAI Solutions—the applied-AI firm spun out of the Prague research lab GoodAI—in August 2022 and renamed it peoly solutions, which is why four of the six client quotes credit 'former GoodAI Solutions' rather than peoly.

The weaker fit is a buyer who needs one comparable engagement documented end to end before committing—the written case studies are 2022-era, anonymous throughout, and state no scope, duration or team size.

### Key strengths
- Two client quotes carry outcomes: GasNet describes a proof of concept that became a production document-processing system, and The Diamond Pro reports around 6,000 hours saved a year
- The edge apps are downloadable with installation guides and interface screenshots dated August 2025, so the product line can be tested on an Axis camera before anything is signed
- Methods are named rather than hidden behind 'proprietary AI': TensorFlow Lite on Android, TensorRT and DeepStream on NVIDIA GPUs, approximate-nearest-neighbor visual search on Kubernetes

### Good to know
- Ask for the surname and track record of whoever would lead your build—the leadership page lists eight people by first name only, including the Head of AI and the AI/ML team lead
- Delivery runs from development centers in Vinnytsia and Lviv under a Prague head office—confirm where your team would sit, who signs the contract and what the continuity plan is
- No rate or minimum engagement is published anywhere—settle the commercial frame early, and ask whether you are buying an ACAP app license, a scoped build or a monthly team

## Which to choose
Choose AI Pirates for:
- closer collaboration at a smaller team scale
- broader service offering — also covers AI Consulting and AI Agents

Choose peoly for:
- larger team capacity for multi-stream or enterprise-scale programs
- disclosed specialization in Manufacturing / SaaS & B2B
- broader service offering — also covers AI Development and AI Automation

## Questions buyers ask

### Which has more E-commerce experience, AI Pirates or peoly?
Both agencies show documented E-commerce work. peoly has the broader industry stack overall, with disclosed experience in Manufacturing, SaaS & B2B beyond their shared focus.

### Which scores higher overall, AI Pirates or peoly?
peoly scores 48.8/100, 1.5 points higher than AI Pirates at 47.3/100. See our methodology for how scores are calculated.

### When should I consider both AI Pirates and peoly?
Consider running parallel discovery briefs with AI Pirates and peoly if your project spans multiple workstreams, you want competitive proposals to compare scope and approach, or you're undecided between the specialization angles each brings (see the Best for cards above). Most engagements ultimately go with one — but the parallel-brief phase is a low-cost way to validate fit.

---
Source: AIAgencies.eu — the curated register of European AI agencies. Rate provenance: "agency-confirmed" = disclosed via submission or claimed profile; "directory-listed" = Clutch or two agreeing B2B directories (lone unverified sources are never written). Full method: https://www.aiagencies.eu/methodology · Rate index: https://www.aiagencies.eu/rates