# 2021.AI vs Netcompany

> Two top-rated AI Consulting agencies in Copenhagen. Side by side: published rates, team size, service and industry coverage, and the curator's assessment of both — pairings are never sold.

Canonical page: https://www.aiagencies.eu/compare/2021-ai-vs-netcompany
Generated: 2026-09-20 · Curated by Gabor Kiss · No paid placements — inclusion, score, and rank are never sold.

## Facts
| | 2021.AI | Netcompany |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 64/100 | 74.8/100 |
| Hourly rate | €130-175/hr (directory-listed) | not published |
| Team size | 50-249 | 250+ |
| Location | Copenhagen, Denmark | Copenhagen, Denmark |
| Founded | 2016 | 2000 |
| Last reviewed | 2026-09-03 | 2026-09-20 |
| Services | AI Consulting, AI Development, Generative AI | AI Development, Generative AI, AI Consulting |
| Industries | FinTech, Public Sector, Healthcare | Public Sector, FinTech |

## Our take on 2021.AI
Reviewed 2026-09-03 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

Four named clients show completed AI systems, not pilots: a GRACE-platform virtual assistant answering patient questions live at Rigshospitalet, a computer-vision proctoring system deployed for Prometric, a recommendation engine BetterNow expects to lift average campaign performance by about 45%, and 20-plus forecasting models that improved Maersk Tankers' freight-price accuracy by 20%.

Every one of these systems runs on 2021.AI's own GRACE platform, so the technical narrative centers on governance and deployment tooling more than on model architecture or evaluation detail—ask what sits underneath GRACE if you need that level of specificity.

The weaker fit is buyers who want a bespoke build outside 2021.AI's platform, since every published deployment runs on GRACE by design.

### Key strengths
- Client testimonials come from named executives, including Maersk Tankers' Chief Digital Officer and BetterNow's CEO, not anonymous quotes.
- The Rigshospitalet assistant explicitly uses retrieval-augmented generation over clinically approved sources, with every response logged for traceability.
- Founded in 2016 with offices across five countries and 65-plus staff, more institutional depth than a single-city boutique.

### Good to know
- Ask whether your project would run on GRACE's standard workflow or require custom architecture outside the platform.
- The 84%-auto-routed email system and its 80% time-saving figure belong to an anonymized regulatory authority—ask for a speakable reference before treating that number as typical.
- Rates aren't published on the agency's site—confirm current pricing directly rather than relying on the directory's listed range.

## Our take on Netcompany
Reviewed 2026-09-20 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

Three named AI systems are documented as running rather than piloted: DSB's train-delay swarm, a model per railway line orchestrated by the firm's PULSE platform, which predicts arrival to within three minutes at 95 percent accuracy; Topdanmark's TopGPT, which masks personal data on locally hosted models before a retrieval step reads the customer's own policy, live around the clock since April 2024 and past 80,000 conversations by that November; and Copenhagen Airport's luggage-timestamp model, in production since 2016 and retrained whenever it drifts.

The AI work is a minority of what the firm publishes—the case index is dominated by large public-sector and enterprise IT delivery for the European Commission, NHS England and the UK Ministry of Defence—and the European Commission's FERMI disinformation tool has completed three police pilots on live data rather than a full deployment.

What raises confidence is what the write-ups admit: the Copenhagen Airport study records the queue-prediction model that never reached production beside the two that did, so ask for the same candor about your own use case.

The weaker fit is a buyer wanting one scoped model from a small team—this is a listed group of more than 9,500 people that builds on its own platforms and expects to operate what it builds, so settle minimum engagement size and account staffing before scoping.

### Key strengths
- Case studies name the firm's own engineers—Mathias Engel on the DSB swarm, Sine Abildgaard Rosenberg on Copenhagen Airport's hazard models—so you can see who built the work, not only who sold it
- Operational detail is published rather than implied: the airport's hazard model is re-evaluated every six months, and TopGPT is audited continuously through a generative-AI evaluation framework
- Facts check out away from the site: Netcompany Group A/S is a listed Danish company, CVR 39488914, founded in Copenhagen in 2000 and reporting 9,500-plus staff across more than 10 countries

### Good to know
- Nothing published indicates cost or minimum engagement size—ask for a commercial frame early, since the documented work runs in years and at national scale (Copenhagen Airport 2015–2023)
- The three AI systems carrying figures are all Danish; if your brief sits in another country, ask which local team delivered the closest comparable and ask to speak to it
- Delivery runs on the firm's own platforms—PULSE, EASLEY AI, PERSEUS—so confirm what you would owe operationally, and on what terms, if you later move off them

## Which to choose
Choose 2021.AI for:
- closer collaboration at a smaller team scale
- disclosed specialization in Healthcare

Choose Netcompany for:
- larger team capacity for multi-stream or enterprise-scale programs
- a higher overall editorial score

## Questions buyers ask

### Which has more FinTech experience, 2021.AI or Netcompany?
Both agencies show documented FinTech work. 2021.AI has the broader industry stack overall, with disclosed experience in Healthcare beyond their shared focus.

### Which scores higher overall, 2021.AI or Netcompany?
Netcompany scores 74.8/100, 10.8 points higher than 2021.AI at 64/100. See our methodology for how scores are calculated.

### When should I consider both 2021.AI and Netcompany?
Consider running parallel discovery briefs with 2021.AI and Netcompany if your project spans multiple workstreams, you want competitive proposals to compare scope and approach, or you're undecided between the specialization angles each brings (see the Best for cards above). Most engagements ultimately go with one — but the parallel-brief phase is a low-cost way to validate fit.

---
Source: AIAgencies.eu — the curated register of European AI agencies. Rate provenance: "agency-confirmed" = disclosed via submission or claimed profile; "directory-listed" = Clutch or two agreeing B2B directories (lone unverified sources are never written). Full method: https://www.aiagencies.eu/methodology · Rate index: https://www.aiagencies.eu/rates