# 10Clouds vs Algomine

> Two top-rated AI Development agencies in Warsaw. Side by side: published rates, team size, service and industry coverage, and the curator's assessment of both — pairings are never sold.

Canonical page: https://www.aiagencies.eu/compare/10clouds-vs-algomine
Generated: 2026-09-17 · Curated by Gabor Kiss · No paid placements — inclusion, score, and rank are never sold.

## Facts
| | 10Clouds | Algomine |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 61.8/100 | 64/100 |
| Hourly rate | €45-85/hr (directory-listed) | €45-85/hr (directory-listed) |
| Team size | 50-249 | 50-249 |
| Location | Warsaw, Poland | Warsaw, Poland |
| Founded | 2009 | 2015 |
| Last reviewed | 2026-09-03 | 2026-09-09 |
| Services | AI Agents, AI Development, Generative AI | AI Consulting, AI Development, Generative AI |
| Industries | FinTech, SaaS & B2B, Healthcare | FinTech, Manufacturing, E-commerce |

## Our take on 10Clouds
Reviewed 2026-09-03 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

The financial-services case studies are the ones to read: a live lead engine for Polfund, a credit-guarantee fund, that screens up to 5,000 public tenders a day on the firm's own AIConsole platform, and a credit-assessment redesign at an unnamed Polish bank that cut analysis time from 90 to 19 minutes per case and reports 698 analyst hours saved a month.

The stack is named throughout—Dynamics 365, Azure OpenAI, Whisper, DeepFace—and an internal AI-recruiter write-up describes what failed before what worked, which is rarer than it should be.

Two things temper the picture: the factoring sales-research tool the homepage counts among production results lists production rollout as a next step, and the PZU partnership announced in 2026 is still in testing, so the named AI work visibly in production comes down to Polfund; most of the 58 published case studies are web, mobile and design delivery from the firm's earlier life.

The weaker fit is buyers outside finance—since the April 2026 merger with 10Clouds Financial Institutions the firm says it concentrates on financial institutions and agentic commerce, so expect the domain depth to sit there.

### Key strengths
- Published rates of €45–85/h against production fintech deployments
- AIConsole is the firm's own open-source orchestration platform and appears in three of the four fintech studies, so you are buying a repeated pattern rather than a first build
- Third-party corroboration is visible: 90-plus Clutch reviews at 4.9, Deloitte Fast 50 and FT1000 listings, and a Select-tier Claude Partner Network listing

### Good to know
- The strongest metrics (79% faster analysis, 698 hours a month) belong to an anonymized bank—ask for a speakable reference behind that study
- The homepage claims 120-plus AI deployments while the site publishes about eight AI case studies—ask for the list behind the number
- Positioning since the merger is finance-only; if your brief sits in another vertical, confirm who would staff it

## Our take on Algomine
Reviewed 2026-09-09 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

The multi-agent engagement is the one that shows the shape of the practice. For a Swedish industrial group of more than 15,000 people operating in over a hundred countries, Algomine ran two parallel workstreams for more than two years: maintaining two production AI applications, a document analyzer and a configuration assistant for bespoke heat exchangers, while building the greenfield multi-agent platform meant to replace a hard-coded chatbot the client had bought elsewhere.

The reasons the client gives are worth reading, because they are the reasons enterprises actually change supplier. Siloed applications with no shared governance, rigid predefined workflows that made every new use case expensive, and AI spend concentrating inside a single vendor ecosystem.

Twenty case studies are published across generative research assistants, retail planogram generation, computer vision for pharmacy shelves and defect management in precision manufacturing. Eleven name their client, and the client list runs to PKO Bank Polski, mBank, Rossmann, Eurocash and Warta.

Algomine publishes no rate itself; the €45–85/h shown here comes from a third-party directory listing. The weaker fit is a buyer who needs a published outcome figure, because the studies explain architecture and engagement shape rather than reporting numbers.

### Key strengths
- The industrial engagement is documented as a two-year, two-workstream relationship covering legacy maintenance and greenfield platform work at the same time
- Vendor lock-in is treated as an architectural requirement, with the platform built to be model and vendor agnostic after the client's costs concentrated in one ecosystem
- Twenty published case studies with eleven naming the client, across banking, retail, pharmacy and precision manufacturing

### Good to know
- The flagship multi-agent client is anonymized despite being identifiable from the description—ask for a speakable reference on it
- The studies explain architecture rather than reporting results; ask what the platform changed in cost, cycle time or adoption
- Named clients like PKO Bank Polski and Rossmann carry no described engagement—ask what was delivered for the two closest to your sector

## Which to choose
Choose 10Clouds for:
- disclosed specialization in SaaS & B2B / Healthcare
- broader service offering — also covers AI Agents

Choose Algomine for:
- disclosed specialization in Manufacturing / E-commerce
- broader service offering — also covers AI Consulting
- a higher overall editorial score

## Questions buyers ask

### Which is cheaper, 10Clouds or Algomine?
Pricing is comparable: 10Clouds at €65/hr median vs Algomine at €65/hr. Choose on specialization rather than cost.

### Which has more FinTech experience, 10Clouds or Algomine?
Both agencies show documented FinTech work and have similar industry breadth. Compare directly on the agency profiles: 10Clouds and Algomine.

### Which scores higher overall, 10Clouds or Algomine?
Algomine scores 64/100, 2.2 points higher than 10Clouds at 61.8/100. See our methodology for how scores are calculated.

### When should I consider both 10Clouds and Algomine?
Consider running parallel discovery briefs with 10Clouds and Algomine if your project spans multiple workstreams, you want competitive proposals to compare scope and approach, or you're undecided between the specialization angles each brings (see the Best for cards above). Most engagements ultimately go with one — but the parallel-brief phase is a low-cost way to validate fit.

---
Source: AIAgencies.eu — the curated register of European AI agencies. Rate provenance: "agency-confirmed" = disclosed via submission or claimed profile; "directory-listed" = Clutch or two agreeing B2B directories (lone unverified sources are never written). Full method: https://www.aiagencies.eu/methodology · Rate index: https://www.aiagencies.eu/rates