# 010 Coding Collective vs Lizard Global

> Two top-rated AI Automation agencies in Rotterdam. Side by side: published rates, team size, service and industry coverage, and the curator's assessment of both — pairings are never sold.

Canonical page: https://www.aiagencies.eu/compare/010-coding-collective-vs-lizard-global
Generated: 2026-10-21 · Curated by Gabor Kiss · No paid placements — inclusion, score, and rank are never sold.

## Facts
| | 010 Coding Collective | Lizard Global |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial score | 57.8/100 | 51/100 |
| Hourly rate | not published | €45-85/hr (directory-listed) |
| Team size | 2-9 | 50-249 |
| Location | Rotterdam, Netherlands | Rotterdam, Netherlands |
| Founded | — | 2012 |
| Last reviewed | 2026-09-04 | 2026-09-04 |
| Services | AI Automation, AI Development, AI Consulting | AI Development, AI Automation, Generative AI |
| Industries | FinTech, Public Sector, E-commerce | SaaS & B2B, E-commerce |

## Our take on 010 Coding Collective
Reviewed 2026-09-04 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

The recruitment case study is the one to read: FastAPI, LangChain, GPT-4 and PostgreSQL behind a CV-screening system that scores against stated job requirements only, refuses to train on historical hiring data, logs every decision, and passed an external audit—the compliance reasoning is written out at a level most AI shops leave to a sales deck.

The Utilitarian shoe-return tool is live in INTERSPORT and Runnersworld stores as a white-label platform on the client's AWS, and the study says plainly that no custom model was trained, which is the right call stated out loud.

Against that, the strongest study is anonymized at the client's request with every figure removed—"significant time savings" is as precise as the results get—and the team is 2-9 people.

The weaker fit is buyers who need a model built rather than assembled, or a supplier deep enough to staff two builds at once.

### Key strengths
- Data residency is specified rather than assumed: hosting is stated as AWS in the EU region against a GDPR requirement written into the brief
- Case studies name what was deliberately left out—no custom model, no over-built architecture—which makes the delivery tradeoffs legible upfront
- Published service lines include code review and security audit of AI-generated codebases, with a free 1.5-hour scoping session and a written summary before any engagement

### Good to know
- No rate is published and the team is 2-9 people—clarify capacity and pricing against the European range on our rate index before scoping a multi-month build
- Ask for a speakable reference behind the recruitment system: the audit result and the time savings are both stated without a name or a number attached
- No team page, founding year or named engineers are published—ask who specifically would build and who maintains the system after handover

## Our take on Lizard Global
Reviewed 2026-09-04 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

The positioning is AI-first, and the published work is integration: the Parexus inspection platform is a progressive web app whose API calls the client's own proprietary AI, the Narrates.ai engagement was product design and UX strategy for someone else's generative tool, and the Company.Info study—the one the site leads with for automation—is a Python, Node and Playwright crawler that processed 40,000-plus pages with no machine learning in it.

That is real delivery, and the outcomes are stated, but nothing in the portfolio shows a model this firm built, trained or evaluated.

Two things to weigh alongside it: delivery runs from Kuala Lumpur, Singapore and Sydney against a Rotterdam front door at €45–85/h, so ask who does the work and where; and the blog carries programmatic listicles, including ones ranking the firm first among Malaysian AI agencies.

The weaker fit is buyers who need the model itself designed—for that, the evidence here stops at the application layer.

### Key strengths
- Published rates of €45–85/h for an application build around an existing model
- Fourteen years of continuous operation with a client name attached to every published study, so the delivery record is checkable end to end
- The Travereel work reports 55% monthly retention against industry benchmarks, which is a product outcome rather than a delivery milestone

### Good to know
- No named ML or data engineers appear on the team pages—ask who would design the model layer if your brief needs one
- The AI-integration cost guides on the blog quote $40,000–250,000 for mid-sized enterprises; treat that as marketing content, not a quote
- Case-study outcomes on the AI work are qualitative—"reduced manual workload", "faster inspections"—so ask for the numbers behind them

## Which to choose
Choose 010 Coding Collective for:
- closer collaboration at a smaller team scale
- disclosed specialization in FinTech / Public Sector
- broader service offering — also covers AI Consulting
- a higher overall editorial score

Choose Lizard Global for:
- larger team capacity for multi-stream or enterprise-scale programs
- disclosed specialization in SaaS & B2B
- broader service offering — also covers Generative AI

## Questions buyers ask

### Which has more E-commerce experience, 010 Coding Collective or Lizard Global?
Both agencies show documented E-commerce work. 010 Coding Collective has the broader industry stack overall, with disclosed experience in FinTech, Public Sector beyond their shared focus.

### Which scores higher overall, 010 Coding Collective or Lizard Global?
010 Coding Collective scores 57.8/100, 6.8 points higher than Lizard Global at 51/100. Both portfolio quality and business credibility feed into the score — see our methodology for the full breakdown.

### Which is faster to engage, 010 Coding Collective or Lizard Global?
Neither publishes lead times, so this is a read on team size rather than a measured answer. 010 Coding Collective runs the smaller team, which usually means fewer procurement gates and a shorter path to kickoff. Lizard Global runs a larger one, which tends to mean more steps but more capacity to start parallel workstreams. Current kickoff availability is the number that actually decides it — ask both.

### When should I consider both 010 Coding Collective and Lizard Global?
Consider running parallel discovery briefs with 010 Coding Collective and Lizard Global if your project spans multiple workstreams, you want competitive proposals to compare scope and approach, or you're undecided between the specialization angles each brings (see the Best for cards above). Most engagements ultimately go with one — but the parallel-brief phase is a low-cost way to validate fit.

---
Source: AIAgencies.eu — the curated register of European AI agencies. Rate provenance: "agency-confirmed" = disclosed via submission or claimed profile; "directory-listed" = Clutch or two agreeing B2B directories (lone unverified sources are never written). Full method: https://www.aiagencies.eu/methodology · Rate index: https://www.aiagencies.eu/rates