# Algomine

> Algomine is a reviewed AI agency in Warsaw, Poland, listed in the AIAgencies.eu register and last assessed 2026-09-09.

Canonical page: https://www.aiagencies.eu/agency/algomine
Generated: 2026-09-21 · Curated by Gabor Kiss · No paid placements — inclusion, score, and rank are never sold.

## Facts
- Location: Warsaw, Poland
- Website: https://algomine.ai
- Hourly rate: €45-85/hr (directory-listed)
- Team size: 50-249
- Founded: 2015
- Services: AI Consulting, AI Development, Generative AI
- Industries: FinTech, Manufacturing, E-commerce
- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/algomine

## About
Algomine is a Warsaw AI and data-science house building generative AI, predictive machine learning, data platforms and MLOps for enterprise clients.

## Documented clients
Documented engagements: PKO Bank Polski, Rossmann, and mBank. No source URL is on file for these yet.

## Curator assessment
Reviewed 2026-09-09 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence.

The multi-agent engagement is the one that shows the shape of the practice. For a Swedish industrial group of more than 15,000 people operating in over a hundred countries, Algomine ran two parallel workstreams for more than two years: maintaining two production AI applications, a document analyzer and a configuration assistant for bespoke heat exchangers, while building the greenfield multi-agent platform meant to replace a hard-coded chatbot the client had bought elsewhere.

The reasons the client gives are worth reading, because they are the reasons enterprises actually change supplier. Siloed applications with no shared governance, rigid predefined workflows that made every new use case expensive, and AI spend concentrating inside a single vendor ecosystem.

Twenty case studies are published across generative research assistants, retail planogram generation, computer vision for pharmacy shelves and defect management in precision manufacturing. Eleven name their client, and the client list runs to PKO Bank Polski, mBank, Rossmann, Eurocash and Warta.

Algomine publishes no rate itself; the €45–85/h shown here comes from a third-party directory listing. The weaker fit is a buyer who needs a published outcome figure, because the studies explain architecture and engagement shape rather than reporting numbers.

### Key strengths
- The industrial engagement is documented as a two-year, two-workstream relationship covering legacy maintenance and greenfield platform work at the same time
- Vendor lock-in is treated as an architectural requirement, with the platform built to be model and vendor agnostic after the client's costs concentrated in one ecosystem
- Twenty published case studies with eleven naming the client, across banking, retail, pharmacy and precision manufacturing

### Good to know
- The flagship multi-agent client is anonymized despite being identifiable from the description—ask for a speakable reference on it
- The studies explain architecture rather than reporting results; ask what the platform changed in cost, cycle time or adoption
- Named clients like PKO Bank Polski and Rossmann carry no described engagement—ask what was delivered for the two closest to your sector

## Compared head-to-head
- Algomine vs 10Clouds: https://www.aiagencies.eu/compare/10clouds-vs-algomine
- Algomine vs deepsense.ai: https://www.aiagencies.eu/compare/algomine-vs-deepsense-ai

---
Source: AIAgencies.eu — the curated register of European AI agencies. Rate provenance: "agency-confirmed" = disclosed via submission or claimed profile; "directory-listed" = Clutch or two agreeing B2B directories (lone unverified sources are never written). Full method: https://www.aiagencies.eu/methodology · Rate index: https://www.aiagencies.eu/rates