# 010 Coding Collective > 010 Coding Collective is a reviewed AI agency in Rotterdam, Netherlands, listed in the AIAgencies.eu register and last assessed 2026-09-04. Canonical page: https://www.aiagencies.eu/agency/010-coding-collective Generated: 2026-09-23 · Curated by Gabor Kiss · No paid placements — inclusion, score, and rank are never sold. ## Facts - Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands - Website: https://010codingcollective.com - Hourly rate: not published - Team size: 2-9 - Services: AI Automation, AI Development, AI Consulting - Industries: FinTech, Public Sector, E-commerce - LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/010-coding-collective ## About 010 Coding Collective is a Rotterdam senior AI software agency building automation, production machine learning and AI audits for banks, insurers and public bodies. ## Documented clients Documented engagements: Utilitarian, BIKEBAZE, INTERSPORT, and Runnersworld. All 4 carry a source URL on file. ## Curator assessment Reviewed 2026-09-04 by Gabor Kiss against published evidence. The recruitment case study is the one to read: FastAPI, LangChain, GPT-4 and PostgreSQL behind a CV-screening system that scores against stated job requirements only, refuses to train on historical hiring data, logs every decision, and passed an external audit—the compliance reasoning is written out at a level most AI shops leave to a sales deck. The Utilitarian shoe-return tool is live in INTERSPORT and Runnersworld stores as a white-label platform on the client's AWS, and the study says plainly that no custom model was trained, which is the right call stated out loud. Against that, the strongest study is anonymized at the client's request with every figure removed—"significant time savings" is as precise as the results get—and the team is 2-9 people. The weaker fit is buyers who need a model built rather than assembled, or a supplier deep enough to staff two builds at once. ### Key strengths - Data residency is specified rather than assumed: hosting is stated as AWS in the EU region against a GDPR requirement written into the brief - Case studies name what was deliberately left out—no custom model, no over-built architecture—which makes the delivery tradeoffs legible upfront - Published service lines include code review and security audit of AI-generated codebases, with a free 1.5-hour scoping session and a written summary before any engagement ### Good to know - No rate is published and the team is 2-9 people—clarify capacity and pricing against the European range on our rate index before scoping a multi-month build - Ask for a speakable reference behind the recruitment system: the audit result and the time savings are both stated without a name or a number attached - No team page, founding year or named engineers are published—ask who specifically would build and who maintains the system after handover ## Compared head-to-head - 010 Coding Collective vs Clockworks: https://www.aiagencies.eu/compare/010-coding-collective-vs-clockworks - 010 Coding Collective vs Lizard Global: https://www.aiagencies.eu/compare/010-coding-collective-vs-lizard-global --- Source: AIAgencies.eu — the curated register of European AI agencies. Rate provenance: "agency-confirmed" = disclosed via submission or claimed profile; "directory-listed" = Clutch or two agreeing B2B directories (lone unverified sources are never written). Full method: https://www.aiagencies.eu/methodology · Rate index: https://www.aiagencies.eu/rates